1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4534(98)00414-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The grain-alignment and its effect on the levitation force of melt processed YBCO single-domained bulk superconductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the raw sample is grown, the sample may be cut in different geometries with intended surface area aligned along the grain. The largest measured levitation stiffness occurs when the magnetic vector field is perpendicular to the copper planes, with a monotonic reduction of levitation force as the magnetic field becomes parallel with the copper planes [34][35][36] . The hysteresis gap is also observed to be largest when the copper planes are perpendicular to the applied field.…”
Section: Manufacturing Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the raw sample is grown, the sample may be cut in different geometries with intended surface area aligned along the grain. The largest measured levitation stiffness occurs when the magnetic vector field is perpendicular to the copper planes, with a monotonic reduction of levitation force as the magnetic field becomes parallel with the copper planes [34][35][36] . The hysteresis gap is also observed to be largest when the copper planes are perpendicular to the applied field.…”
Section: Manufacturing Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the anisotropy in superconductor and matching field effect, critical current density in the ab plane is larger than that in ac or bc plane. 27 Therefore, it can be deduced that superconducting performance of sample B is the best, because single domain can relieve the effect of weak links in superconductor as much as possible and improve carrying current density.
Figure 4. (a) Metallograph of sample A, (b) metallograph of sample B, and (c) metallograph of sample C.
…”
Section: Fundamental Tribological Experiments Of Novel Superconductinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12][13] In addition, it has been found experimentally that the angle between the magnetization direction of the PM and the c axis of the HTS significantly affects the levitation properties. [14][15][16][17][18] In fact, the magnetization direction of the PM does not often coincide with the c axis of the HTS in many practical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%