The Government’s Remembrance Policy: Five Theoretical Hypotheses

Abstract

Remembrance is a powerful instrument of social mobilisation, identity construction and political competition. Its impact on individual and shared beliefs or attitudes makes it an object of government’s interest, because remembrance can be used to legitimise ideologies or policies. Theoretical considerations of a government’s role as a narrator lead us to the general definition of the government’s remembrance policy, which we understand as a complex of narratives and interpretations presented to influence citizens’ attitudes, behaviours, beliefs and identities. The paper develops the definition with five theoretical hypotheses on the effectiveness of remembrance narratives. It argues that the government’s remembrance policy is myth-motoric, non-scientific, emotional, based on commitment and that it is a type of social influence. The study is an initial verification of theoretical approach, and I believe that my arguments will motivate other researchers to investigate different aspects of a government’s desire to narrate past events.

Monuments of sorrow: tools for rooting conflicts and peacebuilding on the example of post-Soviet Georgia

“…8 In English-language discourse, we also fi nd another variant of the term -"remembrance policy," which is "a complex of narratives and interpretations presented to infl uence citizens' attitudes, behaviours, beliefs and identities." 9 Participants in the processes that shape the politics of memory (ideologists, architects, sculptors, etc.) are interested in constructing and reinforcing such memory of the past that best serves current political interests.…”

Pride and Compassion: How Emotional Strategies Target Audiences in Political Communication?

“…In this paper, we consider non-antagonistic emotions as an alternative and discuss if addressing them might influence recipients and inspire mobilization. We believe non-populist appeals to emotions are not limited to mirroring populist narratives in that, as Wawrzyński (2017) suggests, stronger emotions might also strengthen democratic societies and promote prosocial behaviors although the act of doing so should not, as Kazlauskaitė (2022) argues involve the white-washing of wrongdoings.…”

Transforming Fears into the Populist Communication

“…Communication cultivates the political landscape for social mobilization and defines conditions of democratic competition. Alongside the rise of social media and ongoing deep mediatization of politics, it is why populism has become that powerful instrument of political engagement (Cadier & Szulecki, 2020;Wawrzyński, 2017;Wojczewski, 2020).…”