The governance of Ottonian Germany in historiographical perspective

Abstract

The historiographic tradition for the tenth-century Saxon Ottonian dynasty has without doubt been influenced by Germany's more recent past. Events in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries shaped the worldviews of historians both within Germany and without. These events also had a direct effect on the methodologies employed by those historians in studying medieval Germany, and helped to suppress interest in the field by non-German historians.But in the last decades of the twentieth century, there was a kind of watershed for Ottonian studies. Historians who remain influential yet today began to ask new questions and approach the field with new methodologies that took work on the Ottonians in new directions. Additionally, these new approaches have stimulated lively and often contentious debates. There is much about Ottonian government that continues to puzzle scholars. This article provides a sketch of some of the main institutions of Ottonian governance, using these as a way to introduce the reader to the historiography and historiographical debates in the field.

Conceptions of kingship in high‐medieval Germany in historiographical perspective

“…17–37). The administrative structure of the Ottonian realm has its own complicated historiography (Wangerin, ), which is beyond the scope of this essay, but it should be recognised that the debate around Ottonian governmental capabilities has a symbiotic relationship to historical approaches to Ottonian sacral kingship.…”