2010
DOI: 10.1163/19426720-01603004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Governance of International Migration: Mechanisms, Processes, and Institutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
39
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…States are the main actors in the global migration governance system, primarily because of sovereignty-related authority and control (Koser, 2010;Newland, 2005). This has caused formal international institution-building to Migration and Development 3 remain a slow process (Gamlen & Marsh, 2011) as state-based responses to migrant inflows continue to exert more influence than globally coordinated responses (Marchi, 2010).…”
Section: Migrant Network and Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…States are the main actors in the global migration governance system, primarily because of sovereignty-related authority and control (Koser, 2010;Newland, 2005). This has caused formal international institution-building to Migration and Development 3 remain a slow process (Gamlen & Marsh, 2011) as state-based responses to migrant inflows continue to exert more influence than globally coordinated responses (Marchi, 2010).…”
Section: Migrant Network and Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newland (2005) has outlined eight common objectives for global migration governance. Migrant networks can address three of these in particular, relating to criminal networks, tensions between migrants and host communities, and the safety and dignity of migrants.…”
Section: Migrant Network and Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of a single global agency, in the following decades the ILO, UNHCR, IOM and other UN and non-UN organizations emerged as major players, as leading international organizations in the area of migration, refugee and mobility politics. Though they often lacked the necessary funding for certain operations, they nonetheless witnessed an immense growth in regard to their budget, staff, in their number of operations and in their portfolio of activities rendering support and safeguarding the rights and interests of asylum seekers, refugees and migrants worldwide (Düvell, 2002;Newland, 2005;Pécoud, 2013).…”
Section: The Advent Of Migration Governance and Migration Management mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coming together of: (a) increased levels of migration, refugees and mobility flows in the post-Cold War context; (b) the acknowledgement of globalization as a profound challenge to nation-states and longstanding assumptions about the power and capabilities of nation-states to "govern" effectively; (c) the realization that democratic states possess less and less legal sovereignty to limit the acquired and, by now to some extent, already "globalized" rights -or "post-national membership" (Soysal, 1994) -of asylum seekers, refugees and migrants (including even irregular migrants); (d) the growing awareness about transnationalism and the emergence of transnational social spaces (Faist, 2000;Pries, 2001;Wimmer and Glick-Schiller, 2002) together with; (e) the more general debate regarding governance (or "good" governance) as an alternative and/or additional mode to (unilateral) nation-state "government" constituted a set of processes that all fuelled the "internationalization" of migration policy -an increasing trend (and necessity) "pushing" migration and mobility politics "out" and "beyond" the naturalized national "containers" of policy-making (Betts, 2011;Grugel and Piper, 2007;Guiraudon, 2000;Koslowski, 2011;Newland, 2005). Nation-states, however, remained reluctant to follow the example of migrant transnationalism and to embark on a truly "transnational" regulation of cross-border mobility.…”
Section: The Advent Of Migration Governance and Migration Management mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These international dialogues generally seek to strengthen the governance of immigration and to promote its more positive aspects (Newland, 2005). As the Terms of Reference of The Global Migration Group indicates, the perspective of the participating organisations is that:…”
Section: Towards Open Borders Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%