2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2781-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Governance of Global Value Chains: Unresolved Human Rights, Environmental and Ethical Dilemmas in the Apple Supply Chain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
129
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
129
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature on GVCs and GPNs has long focused on questions of governance to locate and understand power and authority in global supply chains, reflecting the frameworks' World Systems Theory and Global Commodity Chain (GCC) theoretical underpinnings (Gereffi et al, 2005;Selwyn, 2012;Werner, 2016). Most versions of these frameworks prioritise the influence of firms as the key buyers, drivers and coordinators of the global economy (Selwyn, 2012;Smith, 2015).…”
Section: Social Responsibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Literature on GVCs and GPNs has long focused on questions of governance to locate and understand power and authority in global supply chains, reflecting the frameworks' World Systems Theory and Global Commodity Chain (GCC) theoretical underpinnings (Gereffi et al, 2005;Selwyn, 2012;Werner, 2016). Most versions of these frameworks prioritise the influence of firms as the key buyers, drivers and coordinators of the global economy (Selwyn, 2012;Smith, 2015).…”
Section: Social Responsibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Interview, 26 September 2011) This reinforces the case that in a neoliberal economy regulated by private-interest standards, resource for social responsibility around labour conditions tends to follow areas of greatest reputational risk and highest public profile. In the realm of corporate sourcing of consumer goods, ethical trade tends to be most advanced for products most strongly connected to consumer tastes and identity, such as food and fashion items, which are also purchased predominantly through buyer-driven supply chains where market strength is linked to high-profile brands (Gereffi et al, 2005;Hughes et al, 2008). Ethical trade has arguably less traction in producer-driven sectors, such as pharmaceuticals, where consumer mobilisation around manufacturers' ethical reputations is weaker, though more research is needed to explore this.…”
Section: Ethical Interventions In Uk Public Sector Procurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumers and other stakeholders are more concerned than ever before about the origins of the products they use and how different parts and components are sourced. Deadly fires in Nike's subcontractor facilities in Bangladesh (Hemphill & White III, ), worker suicides at Foxconn (Clarke & Boersma, ), and ethical issues in the sourcing of rare earth minerals (Abraham, ) are some events that triggered serious debates and raised concerns from consumers as well as governments for ethical practices, transparency, and traceability in global supply chains. While these problems are multifaceted, questions arise regarding whether the current supply chain systems can support a timely provenance of goods and services in a socially responsible way.…”
Section: Scm: Past Present and Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further limit our research to studies that explicitly consider poverty in their design, meaning that studies focusing on important factors that are related to poverty, such as child labor (e.g., LundThomsen & Nadvi, 2010), pollution and environmental degradation (e.g., Maung, Wilson, & Tang, 2016), or human rights (e.g., Clarke & Boersma, 2017) are not included, unless they concentrate explicitly on poverty (e.g., . Finally, the more recent stream of research on poverty alleviation in developed countries is neither considered here, as not only the country context but also the type of poverty typically involved, i.e., relative poverty (Ravallion & Chen, 2009), differ significantly from our focus.…”
Section: Focus Scope and Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%