The Nature of the Nonprofit Sector 2021
DOI: 10.4324/9780367696559-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Gospel of Wealth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, a multiplication of approaches to CSR has occurred [2][3][4][5][6], and the world of science experiences both a strong support for the paradigm introduced by Carnegie and its primal contribution to corporate social responsibility [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], as well as critical opinions of it [16,17]. In 1889, Carnegie proposed philanthropy principles [18], the backbone of which were charity and trust (in last decade of the nineteenth century, human relations management problems and environmental protections issues were not the subject of organizational consideration). The first of them was the same as the biblical principle of mercy [19] and, therefore, in the absence of any formalized social welfare system, it was tantamount to entrepreneurs taking over part of the responsibility for improving the living conditions of society.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As a consequence, a multiplication of approaches to CSR has occurred [2][3][4][5][6], and the world of science experiences both a strong support for the paradigm introduced by Carnegie and its primal contribution to corporate social responsibility [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], as well as critical opinions of it [16,17]. In 1889, Carnegie proposed philanthropy principles [18], the backbone of which were charity and trust (in last decade of the nineteenth century, human relations management problems and environmental protections issues were not the subject of organizational consideration). The first of them was the same as the biblical principle of mercy [19] and, therefore, in the absence of any formalized social welfare system, it was tantamount to entrepreneurs taking over part of the responsibility for improving the living conditions of society.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principle of trust alluded to the biblical doctrine of wealthy individuals who were expected to manage their wealth on behalf of other people and therefore to dispose of their assets in a socially acceptable manner. If the entrepreneur did not perform these duties in person, this was to be done by talented people; nevertheless, the author did not formulate any criteria of talent [18,20] (p. 3). Carnegie was also a strong opponent of traditional "blind" charity, which he considered one of the most serious obstacles to human development [18] (p. 13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations