“The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly”: evaluating the radiocarbon chronology of the middle and late Upper Paleolithic in the Enisei River valley, south-central Siberia

Graf, Kelly E.

doi:10.1016/j.jas.2008.10.014

Cited by 98 publications

(79 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In fact, discounting the two certainly too-young 15.5-17.7 ka OSL dates in Liu et al's (2009) strata 5-6, the OSL dates in SDG01's IUP strata range from approximately 30-37 ka, younger than, but not appreciably so given the time depth and error ranges involved, the older U series dates and the new AMS date for the locality. This correspondence between older dates at the locality suggests that a maximum 37-41 cal ka date for the IUP deposits at the locality is not unreasonable (see also Li et al 2013), though cautiously so, per Pettit et al (2003) and Graf (2008).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 60%

Redating Shuidonggou Locality 1 and Implications for the Initial Upper Paleolithic in East Asia

Morgan

Barton

et al. 2014

Radiocarbon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT.A review of recently published temporal data from Shuidonggou Locality 1 indicates that a 40-43 cal ka date for the inception of Initial Upper Paleolithic (IUP) blade-oriented technologies in East Asia is warranted. Comparison of the dates from Shuidonggou to other Asian IUP dates in Korea, Siberia, and Mongolia supports this assertion, indicating that the initial appearance of the IUP in East Asia generally corresponds in time to the fluorescence of the IUP in eastern Europe and western Asia. This conclusion preliminarily suggests that either a version of the IUP originated independently in East Asia just prior to 40 cal ka, or more likely, that an early, initial diffusion of the IUP into East Asia occurred ~41 cal ka, a hypothesis consistent with current estimates for the evolution or arrival of modern humans in the region.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 60%

Redating Shuidonggou Locality 1 and Implications for the Initial Upper Paleolithic in East Asia

Morgan

Barton

et al. 2014

Radiocarbon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…2 A significant environmental shift was driven by the warming, which occurred in the High Arctic~17-15 kya. 3 It appears that some Siberian groups may have reached western Alaskã 14.5 kya, whereas others were stuck in the lowlands of central Beringia (the Bering Isthmus proper) until the last flooding of the Bering Strait,~11.5 kya.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mitochondrial genome diversity at the Bering Strait area highlights prehistoric human migrations from Siberia to northern North America

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…To this end, we used many of the criteria listed by others (Goebel and Keene 2014;Graf 2009;Pettitt et al 2003) as guides to help eliminate suspect dates, resulting in a more high-graded suite of dates for the NEM, compared to Lothrop et al (2011). In particular, we favored:…”

Section: Dating Analysis Of Northeast Paleoindian Point Formsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Early Human Settlement of Northeastern North America

Lothrop

Lowery²,

Spiess

et al. 2016

PaleoAmerica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper summarizes current evidence for earliest human occupation of northeastern North America during the late Pleistocene and early Holocene. We review evolution of the region's landscapes and evidence of archaeological chronologies as context for understanding human settlement of the region. Current data support limited evidence for pre-Clovis occupation south of the Laurentide glacial margin, followed by a significant temporal gap prior to early Paleoindian settlement of the region. Despite differences in subregional data sets, mapping of site distributions and assemblage data do support the notion of variation in lifeways between Paleoindian populations occupying formerly glaciated parts of the Northeast in the late Pleistocene, versus contemporary groups in lands south of the Laurentide glacial margin. Through time, the greatest differences in Paleoindian land use and technology occur between the Younger Dryas and early Holocene.

show abstract

“The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly”: evaluating the radiocarbon chronology of the middle and late Upper Paleolithic in the Enisei River valley, south-central Siberia

Cited by 98 publications

References 42 publications

Redating Shuidonggou Locality 1 and Implications for the Initial Upper Paleolithic in East Asia

Redating Shuidonggou Locality 1 and Implications for the Initial Upper Paleolithic in East Asia

Mitochondrial genome diversity at the Bering Strait area highlights prehistoric human migrations from Siberia to northern North America

Early Human Settlement of Northeastern North America

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About