2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Good Governance Indicators of the Millennium Challenge Account: How Many Dimensions are Really Being Measured?

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To capture these effects, governance assessments can be guided along a set of different governance indicators which cover a wide range of potential governance-related issues. Importantly, governance indicators do not possess a claim of universal applicability (Kaufmann and Kraay, 2007;Knoll and Zloczysti, 2012), with a meaningful conceptualisation of 'good governance' indicators strongly depending on the empirical context (Andrews, 2008). Consequentially, this paper builds on previous works of (Dunu, 2013;United Nations, 2000) to define an encompassing set of six different 'good governance' indicators, which are specifically related to the context of energy access in this sub-section.…”
Section: Assessing 'Good Governance' In the Context Of Energy Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To capture these effects, governance assessments can be guided along a set of different governance indicators which cover a wide range of potential governance-related issues. Importantly, governance indicators do not possess a claim of universal applicability (Kaufmann and Kraay, 2007;Knoll and Zloczysti, 2012), with a meaningful conceptualisation of 'good governance' indicators strongly depending on the empirical context (Andrews, 2008). Consequentially, this paper builds on previous works of (Dunu, 2013;United Nations, 2000) to define an encompassing set of six different 'good governance' indicators, which are specifically related to the context of energy access in this sub-section.…”
Section: Assessing 'Good Governance' In the Context Of Energy Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of experts have insisted that aid projects are successful only when accompanied by good policies and institutions (Burnside and Dollar, 2000;World Bank, 1998). In the United States, for example, the Millennium Challenge Account has announced that, based on compiled governance indicators, it would provide development aid only to countries that proved to be well-governed (Knoll and Zloczysti, 2012). Such practice can also be found in multilateral agencies, such as the International Development Association, part of the World Bank Group.…”
Section: Good Governance Agenda and International Donor Agenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Open Budget Index (OBI) serves as one sub-indicator within the World Bank's six Governance Indicators (WGIs), which in turn constitutes a large part of the Millennium Challenge Corporation's (MCC) multi-billion dollar funding decisions (Gisselquist, 2013;Knoll & Zloczysti, 2012). The Aid Transparency Index (ATI) attributes 3.33% of its points to the strength of a country's freedom of information (FOI) law, based on the RTI-Rating.…”
Section: Why Itpis Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…514, 518). It is also one of the culprits behind critiques of convergent/discriminant validity -why indexes that purport to assess multiple dimensions of a concept frequently only measure only one or two (among many examples, see Knoll & Zloczysti, 2012).…”
Section: Content Validity: Incomplete Evalua-tions Of Policy Domains mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation