The Good and Bad of Ambidexterity: In Which Domains Should Firms Be Ambidextrous or Not to Foster Innovativeness?

Zacharias, Nicolas

doi:10.24251/hicss.2017.558

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 52 publications

(130 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similarly to previous studies, this study shows that the innovativeness of suppliers is positively connected to their ambidexterity in the supply chain, both in their exploration and exploitation strategies (He and Wong, 2004; Zacharias, 2017). These strategies are necessary for understanding suppliers' varying judgments on innovation enablers in tendering.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

Public procurement as an attractive customer: a supplier perspective

Karttunen

Matela

Hallikas

et al. 2022

IJOPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeBuyer–supplier relationships in public procurement have garnered increasing attention in research, yet studies on the perspective of suppliers on public procurement have remained limited. This research takes the perspective of suppliers and aims to investigate the innovativeness of suppliers and the impact of supply chain ambidexterity strategies on their perceptions about public procurement in terms of innovation enablers and customer attractiveness.Design/methodology/approachThis research draws from a survey of 137 suppliers to the public sector in Finland and applies PLS-path modeling to test its hypotheses.FindingsThe findings reveal that the ambidexterity strategy of suppliers in the supply chain influences how they perceive the innovation enablers and customer attractiveness of public organizations since processes of public procurement do not support these strategies fully. Supplier innovativeness has an influence on the perceived innovation enablers of public procurement, which, in turn, influences customer attractiveness.Practical implicationsThe innovativeness and strategies of suppliers for the supply chain have an impact on how attractive they perceive public procurement. The findings of this research provide insights on why the customer attractiveness of public procurement may not be high enough to secure the competition in their bidding processes.Originality/valueThe study’s contribution adds to the field of buyer–supplier relationships and customer attractiveness in public procurement by showing the importance of innovation enablers and highlighting the impact of supplier's ambidexterity in the supply chain on their perceptions about public procurement.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%