2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.03.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The good and bad news about the new liquidity rules of Basel III in Western European countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
75
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
75
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ashraf et al (2015) also found a positive and statistically significant relationship between the NSFR and financial stability of banks. However, Dietrich, Hess, and Wanzenried (2014) suggests that short-term investments and reduced maturity should reduce profitability as the longer-term investment and the mismatch of maturity are positively related to the banks' profitability. This might be the case with Kenyan commercial banks where they largely rely on short-term investments and reduced maturity assets which affect profitability negatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ashraf et al (2015) also found a positive and statistically significant relationship between the NSFR and financial stability of banks. However, Dietrich, Hess, and Wanzenried (2014) suggests that short-term investments and reduced maturity should reduce profitability as the longer-term investment and the mismatch of maturity are positively related to the banks' profitability. This might be the case with Kenyan commercial banks where they largely rely on short-term investments and reduced maturity assets which affect profitability negatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into account the above considerations, our vector contains (a) the cost‐to‐income ratio, (b) the unweighted leverage ratio (equity‐to‐total assets ratio (Adrian & Shin, 2010; Kishan & Opiela, 2000); (c) a dummy for banks with regulatory liquidity constraints (i.e., those with a net stable funding ratio [NSFR] of less than 95% in the period 2011–2015); and (d) a dummy for banks that were recapitalised by the authorities during the crisis (Brei, Gambacorta, & von Peter, 2013). The NSFR ratio has been reconstructed historically using the methodology described in Dietrich, Hess, and Wanzenried (2014). As the NSFR ratio was included in the Basel III agreement in December 2010, we identified banks with regulatory liquidity constraints only over the period 2011–2015.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khan, Scheule, and Wu (11/2015) show that bank size and capital buffers may also affect the relation between liquidity risk taking and cost of funds. Dietrich, Hess, and Wanzenried (2014) found that banks with lower NSFR benefit from lower funding costs as a result of using less costly short-term funding. Kapinos and Mitnik (2015) provide an overview of the stress testing practice in banks and review several critiques.…”
Section: Complying With the Regulatory Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%