2000
DOI: 10.5840/tpm20001060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The God experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, there are the proponents of so‐called Intelligent Design, whose position carries no Biblical commitments at all; they are neither committed to any particular age for the universe, nor to the separate creation of the species. Supporters of Intelligent Design in turn divide into two groups: those such as Michael Behe () who believe that certain facts in biology support intelligent design, and those such as Stannard () and Dembski () who believe that the so‐called ‘fine tuning’ argument in cosmology points to an intelligent designer.…”
Section: A Critique Of Midgley's Accountmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, there are the proponents of so‐called Intelligent Design, whose position carries no Biblical commitments at all; they are neither committed to any particular age for the universe, nor to the separate creation of the species. Supporters of Intelligent Design in turn divide into two groups: those such as Michael Behe () who believe that certain facts in biology support intelligent design, and those such as Stannard () and Dembski () who believe that the so‐called ‘fine tuning’ argument in cosmology points to an intelligent designer.…”
Section: A Critique Of Midgley's Accountmentioning
confidence: 99%