2017
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The GMRT 150 MHz all-sky radio survey

Abstract: We present the first full release of a survey of the 150 MHz radio sky, observed with the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (GMRT) between April 2010 and March 2012 as part of the TIFR GMRT Sky Survey (TGSS) project. Aimed at producing a reliable compact source survey, our automated data reduction pipeline efficiently processed more than 2000 h of observations with minimal human interaction. Through application of innovative techniques such as image-based flagging, direction-dependent calibration of ionospheric … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
767
4
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 822 publications
(825 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
23
767
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In project 21 013, sources were only considered for observation if they had steep radio spectra (α < −0.5) based on their VLBI flux densities. To ensure that the sources were sufficiently bright to be detected with the GMRT, in project 29 007, we selected sources based on their 1.4 GHz flux densities in FIRST, and based on whether they were detected at 325 or 148 MHz with the Westerbork Northern Sky Survey (WENSS; Rengelink et al 1997) The data were reduced using the SPAM pipeline as described by Intema et al (2016). The flux density scale was set by 3C48, 3C147 or 3C286 and was tied to the Scaife & Heald (2012) standard with an accuracy of ∼ 10 per cent (e.g.…”
Section: Observations With the Gmrtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In project 21 013, sources were only considered for observation if they had steep radio spectra (α < −0.5) based on their VLBI flux densities. To ensure that the sources were sufficiently bright to be detected with the GMRT, in project 29 007, we selected sources based on their 1.4 GHz flux densities in FIRST, and based on whether they were detected at 325 or 148 MHz with the Westerbork Northern Sky Survey (WENSS; Rengelink et al 1997) The data were reduced using the SPAM pipeline as described by Intema et al (2016). The flux density scale was set by 3C48, 3C147 or 3C286 and was tied to the Scaife & Heald (2012) standard with an accuracy of ∼ 10 per cent (e.g.…”
Section: Observations With the Gmrtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also consider the detectability at 150 MHz with the LOFAR (van Haarlem et al 2013). Note that, apart from these telescopes, there are other relevant telescopes including: WSRT/Apertif (Oosterloo et al 2010), GMRT (Intema et al 2016), and MWA (Tingay et al 2013). Note that the values of the JVLA are based on current data while the other values are based on current predictions of performance.…”
Section: The Sensitivity Of the Radio Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We generated our initial candidate list from a recently published continuum all-sky survey carried out on the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (GMRT) at a frequency of 150 MHz (TGSS ADR; Intema et al 2016). Pulsars stand out at 150 MHz.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we are interested only in point sources and not extended sources (HII regions, supernova remnants, extragalactic sources, etc. ), it would be standard practice to apply a cutoff based on the ratio of the total flux (St) to peak flux density (Sp) following Intema et al (2016). However, this approach would likely eliminate real point sources due to the known enhanced scattering over large regions toward the galactic center (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation