2018
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1722320115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The glycolipid GM1 reshapes asymmetric biomembranes and giant vesicles by curvature generation

Abstract: SignificanceThe multifaceted involvement of GM1 as a ligand in many cellular functions has been well recognized. We find that GM1 readily desorbs from the membrane of cell-sized model biomimetic systems (giant unilamellar vesicles). The desorption is unbalanced, creating an asymmetry between the bilayer leaflets. This results in reshaping weakly curved membranes into nanotubular invaginations stabilized by the membrane spontaneous curvature, which we quantify experimentally. Computer simulations confirm the ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
96
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
11
96
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6. This in turn leads to the generation of highly curved protrusions (nanotubes and buds) and an increase in the spontaneous tension (69,70). As a result, the projected area of the vesicle decreases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6. This in turn leads to the generation of highly curved protrusions (nanotubes and buds) and an increase in the spontaneous tension (69,70). As a result, the projected area of the vesicle decreases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 E; Video S4) have these diameters and seem to become thinner and with diameters not optically resolvable as fusion proceeds further. The exact change in the membrane spontaneous curvature can be assessed with tube-pulling experiments (70) or micropipette aspiration (75) and remains to be confirmed. Presumably, lipid flip-flop over time would allow for relaxing the spontaneous curvature acquired from fusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OMVs sequestered gangliosides within the host plasma membrane to produce large ganglioside clusters, which have been found to lower local bending parameters and dramatically enhance preferences for spontaneous curvature and bilayer reshaping. [39][40][57][58] Plasma membrane heterogeneity also affected bilayer bending: constituent lipids were able to reorganize themselves to reduce line tension energies e.g. PIP 2 lipids were preferentially partitioned to the inner plasma membrane leaflet when it was made round through interactions with the smooth OMV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that ganglioside head groups support strong cohesive interactions with invasive toxins, and tend to facilitate membrane reshaping due to their high intrinsic positive curvature, we next explored the interaction of OMVs with more complex models of host membranes. [36][37][38][39][40][41] Both OMVs were simulated with a pre-equilibrated, [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] multicomponent plasma membrane model composed of POPC (25%), POPE (25%) 1palmitoyl-2-oleoyl phosphatidyl serine, or POPS (7.5%), GM3 ganglioside (5%), sphingomyelin (7.5%), cholesterol (25%) and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate, or PIP 2 (5%). Table 3 and Table 4 summarize the findings from these simulations, which are described in detail below.…”
Section: Omvs Interacting With Model Plasma Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clustering of lipids by AB5 toxins and SV40 virus is thought to induce compression of the lipids as a means of bending membranes (10,22,32) via a process linked to the geometry of receptor binding sites (9,33). However, much of this process warrants further characterization, including the role of the clustering and leaflet asymmetry in the generation of curvature (34). In this study, we investigated the factors that drive membrane bending by CTxB, a prototypical cargo for clathrin-independent endocytosis, using super-resolution polarized localization microscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%