2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The glutathione S-transferase T1 deletion is associated with susceptibility to multiple sclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another results from study of patients with North-European [11] or Greek origin [13] did not identify any relevant association of these changes with multiple sclerosis. Our results indicate the importance of GSTT1 null genotype (p=0.04) and double null genotype GSTM1, GSTT1 (p=0.006) for MS. Higher prevalence of null genotypes in control group suggests the protective role of these changes for MS onset and development, which is not in line with previously mentioned data [12]. We obtained significant result in GSTT1 null genotype and its association with mid-rate progression (p=0.05), also the frequency of GSTM1, GSTT1 double null genotype is significantly lower in subgroup of MS patients with progression rate defined as slow (p=0.05) and middle (p=0.045).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another results from study of patients with North-European [11] or Greek origin [13] did not identify any relevant association of these changes with multiple sclerosis. Our results indicate the importance of GSTT1 null genotype (p=0.04) and double null genotype GSTM1, GSTT1 (p=0.006) for MS. Higher prevalence of null genotypes in control group suggests the protective role of these changes for MS onset and development, which is not in line with previously mentioned data [12]. We obtained significant result in GSTT1 null genotype and its association with mid-rate progression (p=0.05), also the frequency of GSTM1, GSTT1 double null genotype is significantly lower in subgroup of MS patients with progression rate defined as slow (p=0.05) and middle (p=0.045).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…The aim of our work was to analyse selected genetic changes (GSTM1, GSTT1 null genotypes; rs1695 GSTP1, rs10735781 EVI5) in a group of Slovak MS patients and to shed light on their potential importance for disease onset or disability rate. Certain genetic variations of glutathione-S-transferases with the negative influence on enzyme functions have been previously indicated as associated with multiple sclerosis, but their role in the etiopathogenesis of MS still remains controversial [10][11][12]. In group of 455 Serbian MS patients, GSTT1 null genotype and GSTM1, GSTT1 double null genotypes were observed in significantly higher frequency (p<0.0001 and p<0.05) when compared to 366 healthy people [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 Although GSTP1 polymorphisms were not identified as possible susceptibility genes by genome-wide association studies, we explored a possible relationship between GSTP1 polymorphisms and allelic gene variants and the risk of MS due to the possible role of oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation in the pathogenesis of MS 1 and the upregulation of GSTP1 gene expression found in active demyelinating MS lesions. 3 Although two preliminary studies did not find a relationship between polymorphisms in either GSTM1 4,5 or GSTT1 5 and the risk for MS, another recent study showed an association between GSTT1 deletion and MS susceptibility 6 . Another study reported a relationship between GSTM1, GSTM3 and GSTP1, but not GSTT1, and the degree of disability in MS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have examined associations between GSTT1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms and ADs, but the results reported are contradictory, possibly because of the low statistical power of individual studies (LEE et al, 2015). While some authors suggest that there is an association of GSTT1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms and these diseases (MANN et al, 2000;ŽIVKOVIĆ et al, 2013), other authors indicate that there is no association between them (STAVROPOULOU et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%