2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2004.01470.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The glucose oxidase of Penicillium variabile P16: gene cloning, sequencing and expression

Abstract: Aims:  Isolation and characterization of the glucose oxidase (GOX)‐encoding gene from a Penicillium variabile strain (P16) having a high level of GOX activity and comparison of its expression with that of another strain of P. variabile (NRRL 1048) characterized by low GOX activity. Methods and Results:  The gene, isolated by PCR consisted of 1818 bp encoding 605 amino acid residues. Gene expression was analysed by Northern blotting and compared with that of P. variabile NRRL 1048. The higher GOX activity of st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, the intracellular rGOD activity of Penicillium variabile P16 was maximum (4·30 U ml −1 ) after 36 h of fermentation, while the extracellular one was highest (8·05 U ml −1 ) at the 96th hour (Pulci et al . ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, the intracellular rGOD activity of Penicillium variabile P16 was maximum (4·30 U ml −1 ) after 36 h of fermentation, while the extracellular one was highest (8·05 U ml −1 ) at the 96th hour (Pulci et al . ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…) and Pichia pastoris (Pulci et al . ). The methylotrophic yeast P. pastoris has been proved successfully due to its powerful and tightly regulated methanol‐inducible alcohol oxidase 1 promoter (AOX 1) and its capacity for exogenous protein secretion (Macauley‐Patrick et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Same letters above column represent nonsignificant difference between treatments, while different letters represent significant differences (LSD, ANOVA, P < 0.05). Stosz et al, 1996;Murray et al, 1997;Rando et al, 1997;Liu et al, 1998;Pulci et al, 2004). GOX activities have been detected in insect species such as A. mellifera (Ohashi et al, 1999), H. zea (Eichenseer et al, 1999), S. exigua (Merkx-Jacques and Bede, 2004;Merkx-Jacques and Bede, 2005), Mamestra configurata (Merkx-Jacques and Bede, 2004), H. armigera, and H. assulta (Zong and Wang, 2004), and recently were extensively investigated in 85 species of Lepidoptera and three species of plant-feeding Hymenoptera (Eichenseer et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of their mutation and expression in different organisms was to increase enzyme yield, facilitate enzyme purification, increase specific activity, improve the enzyme stability, and enhance selectivity for glucose. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] The two enzyme families differ in their redox potentials, the strengths of the bonds between their protein-devoid apoenzymes and their cofactors, their cosubstrates, their turnover rates, their Michaelis constants (K m ), and their selectivity for glucose.…”
Section: The Enzymes Of Glucose Electrooxidizing Anodesmentioning
confidence: 99%