2022
DOI: 10.1017/ssh.2022.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “Glorious” Revolution’s Inglorious Religious Commitment: Why Parliamentary Rule Failed to Secure Religious Liberty

Abstract: Many scholars contend that the “Glorious” Revolution of 1688 restrained governmental abuses in Britain by preventing the Crown from engaging in irresponsible behavior. However, the question of whether it imposed similar restraints on Parliament has received limited scrutiny. This oversight applies in particular to the religious sphere and outside of England. Rather than create the general conditions for liberty, we contend that the institutional legacy of the Revolution of 1688 was biased toward those in the w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Weber shows how public borrowing produced a new type of political obligation which served as a protection against rebellion and war. Kulkarni and Pfaff studied the effects of the Glorious Revolution on religious liberty in Scotland. They coded ecclesiastical legislation to study the conditions of religious liberty and found that the legislation displays the dominance of special interest groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weber shows how public borrowing produced a new type of political obligation which served as a protection against rebellion and war. Kulkarni and Pfaff studied the effects of the Glorious Revolution on religious liberty in Scotland. They coded ecclesiastical legislation to study the conditions of religious liberty and found that the legislation displays the dominance of special interest groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%