The global temperature-related mortality impact of earlier decarbonization for the Australian health sector and economy: A modelling study

Abstract

Background Sustained elevated concentration of GHGs is predicted to increase global mortality. With the Australian health sector responsible for 7% of the nation’s GHG emissions, the benefits and costs of various decarbonisation trajectories are currently being investigated. To assist with this effort, we model the impact earlier decarbonisation has on temperature-related mortality. Design We used DICE-EMR, an Integrated Assessment Model with an endogenous mortality response, to simulate Australian GHG trajectories and estimate the temperature-related mortality impact of early decarbonisation. We modelled a linear decline of the Australian health sector’s and economy’s GHG annual emissions to net-zero targets of 2040 and 2050. Main outcome measure Deaths averted and monetary-equivalent welfare gain. Results Decarbonisation of the Australian health sector by 2050 and 2040 is projected to avert an estimated 69,000 and 77,000 global temperature-related deaths respectively in a Baseline global emissions scenario. Australian economy decarbonisation by 2050 and 2040 is projected to avert an estimated 988,000 and 1,101,000 global deaths respectively. Assuming a low discount rate and high global emissions trajectory, we estimate a monetary equivalent welfare gain of $151 billion if the Australian health sector decarbonises by 2040, only accounting for the benefits in reducing temperature-related mortality. Conclusions Earlier decarbonisation has a significant impact on temperature-related mortality. Many uncertainties exist and health impacts other than temperature-related mortality are not captured by this analysis. Nevertheless, such models can help communicate the health risk of climate change and improve climate policy decision making.

Exploring opportunities to reduce scope 3 emissions in renewably powered health services

“…2 This is the next crucial step in the assessment and comparison of scope 3 mitigation strategies and will become increasingly relevant as the social cost of carbon is increased to better reflect realworld impact. 15 Efficient and effective decarbonisation and transition to a circular economy model will require innovation and capacity building by enhancing partnerships between health services and universities. These partnerships will allow health workers and leaders Perspectives to codevelop solutions with academics engineering, material science, implementation and system science, health economics and many other sectors.…”

“…Scope 3 emissions data are important in developing evidence‐based procurement decisions as emphasised in the National Health and Climate Change Strategy 2 . This is the next crucial step in the assessment and comparison of scope 3 mitigation strategies and will become increasingly relevant as the social cost of carbon is increased to better reflect real‐world impact 15 …”

It's time for Australian hospitals to be all‐electric (and powered by 100% renewable energy)

“…3 The health of present and future generations depends on significant cuts to greenhouse gas emissions this decade. 4 The health care sector has both the capacity and duty to lead this transition, with all-electric hospitals and 100% renewable electricity supply being part of the solution.…”

“…2,3 It is time to acknowledge that "brief intervention" is a bazaar of techniques without a defined method. In contrast, motivational interviewing, a cornerstone of care, 4 is a well defined and effective technique that can be learned.…”

Balancing the health benefits and climate mortality costs of haemodialysis

“…The MCC metric has previously been used to explore the health benefits of earlier healthcare decarbonisation in Australia. 24 The key distinction from the SCC is that the MCC is presented in deaths, rather than dollars. Policy makers can then make their own judgements on how to monetarily value the mortality impacts.…”