The Global Platform Economy: A New Offshoring Institution Enabling Emerging-Economy Microproviders

Abstract

Global online platforms match firms with service providers around the world, in services ranging from software development to copywriting and graphic design. Unlike in traditional offshore outsourcing, service providers are predominantly one-person microproviders located in emerging-economy countries not necessarily associated with offshoring and often disadvantaged by negative country images. How do these microproviders survive and thrive? We theorize global platforms through transaction cost economics (TCE), arguing that they are a new technology-enabled offshoring institution that emerges in response to cross-border information asymmetries that hitherto prevented microproviders from participating in offshoring markets. To explain how platforms achieve this, we adapt signaling theory to a TCE-based model and test our hypotheses by analyzing 6 months of transaction records from a leading platform. To help interpret the results and generalize them beyond a single platform, we introduce supplementary data from 107 face-to-face interviews with microproviders in Southeast Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. Individuals choose microprovidership when it provides a better return on their skills and labor than employment at a local (offshoring) firm. The platform acts as a signaling environment that allows microproviders to inform foreign clients of their quality, with platform-generated signals being the most informative signaling type. Platform signaling disproportionately benefits emerging-economy providers, allowing them to partly overcome the effects of negative country images and thus diminishing the importance of home country institutions. Global platforms in other factor and product markets likely promote cross-border microbusiness through similar mechanisms.

Networked but Commodified: The (Dis)Embeddedness of Digital Labour in the Gig Economy

“…Focused coding was then employed to highlight the most common and revealing initial codes and to merge appropriate initial codes into new higher-level codes, as suggested by Charmaz (2006). Further details regarding our approach to mixed methods, interview sampling, recruitment and interview protocol can be found in the methodological appendix to Lehdonvirta et al (2019).…”

Digital inequalities 3.0: Emergent inequalities in the information age

“…To a great extent, these considerations extend to gigs that are performed entirely online on platforms like Upwork by freelance subcontractors such as graphic designers, software developers, translators, and other "virtual" workers (Huws, 2003). These activities open market opportunities to professionals in emerging and low-income economies (Lehdonvirta, et al, 2019) and can thus be construed as a remedy to global rather than local asymmetries. Nevertheless, they generate competition between workers worldwide, driving down remunerations and shifting bargaining power toward clients -usually tech companies based in developed countries.…”

When Motivation Becomes Desperation: Online Freelancing During the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…We focus attention to online freelancers because of the precarity of their work arrangements. Online freelancers and the online labor markets where they seek work are a relatively recent subset of labor markets, seen by many as both a means to provide opportunities for workers seeking flexible employment arrangements -short term 'gigs' -and for organizations to help absorb market shocks (Kalleberg, 2003;Lehdonvirta et al, 2019). Freelance work is project-based: there is little commitment between employer and worker beyond the specifics of the project's contract (Wood et al, 2019).…”