2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scib.2018.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The global oxygen budget and its future projection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
65
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the troposphere, ozone formation is resulted from a complicated chemical process, and requires ozone precursors, such as VOCs (volatile organic carbons) and NO x = NO + NO 2 (nitrogen oxides) (Sillman, 1995). As the increase in industrial activity and number of automobiles, the precursors of ozone (O 3 ) and the global budget of oxidization are also significantly increased Huang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the troposphere, ozone formation is resulted from a complicated chemical process, and requires ozone precursors, such as VOCs (volatile organic carbons) and NO x = NO + NO 2 (nitrogen oxides) (Sillman, 1995). As the increase in industrial activity and number of automobiles, the precursors of ozone (O 3 ) and the global budget of oxidization are also significantly increased Huang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with our results on soil moisture, the NDVI turned to increase after the mid‐2000s over the northeast of China (Chu et al, ), indicating that the soil wetting benefited the ecological restoration. The restored productivity to eroded soil in drylands during the recent years will increase the CO 2 storage of soil, and a recent pause in the growth rate of atmospheric CO 2 was reported (Keenan et al, ), which can mitigate global warming (Huang, Yu, et al, ) and O 2 deficit (Huang et al, ). Besides, the decadal wetting during 2005–2017 will contribute to preventing more drought events and desertification from causing possible economic losses in the range of $42 billion annually (Winslow et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carbon emissions from respiration per individual in this study are only a rst-order approximation based on the above assumption. The CO 2 emission from one person is assumed to be 89.90 kg C yr − 1 in this study but varies over a range of 52.9-160 kg C yr − 1 (Additional le 1: Table S6) in other studies based on different methods or without considering different age groups and gender [16,18,63,[20][21][22]64]. The value used by Huang et al is much higher than other studies.…”
Section: Uncertainty Associated With the Parametersmentioning
confidence: 96%