2013
DOI: 10.1080/14682745.2012.759560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The global effects of nuclear winter: science and antinuclear protest in the United States and the Soviet Union during the 1980s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The entanglement of science and politics in the debates around nuclear winter, accurately described by Matthias Dörries (2011) and Paul Rubinson (2014), sheds light on the process that reconfigured the nuclear order of time. Both the metaphor of a nuclear winter and the ensuing public debate were key in overcoming the modern (and artificial) divide between society and nature.…”
Section: Framing a Nuclear Order Of Time 271mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The entanglement of science and politics in the debates around nuclear winter, accurately described by Matthias Dörries (2011) and Paul Rubinson (2014), sheds light on the process that reconfigured the nuclear order of time. Both the metaphor of a nuclear winter and the ensuing public debate were key in overcoming the modern (and artificial) divide between society and nature.…”
Section: Framing a Nuclear Order Of Time 271mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Sagan, an expert on planetary research with a famous TV series, Cosmos, used this scenario to advocate for nuclear disarmament. The debate among scientists became inextricably political; both in the United States and the Soviet Union, the nuclear winter hypothesis was taken up by advocates of the ban on nuclear weapons (Dörries, 2011;Rubinson, 2014). In America, the controversy would focus narrowly on the scientific validity of the hypothesis.…”
Section: Framing a Nuclear Order Of Time 271mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides its conceptual merit, there is a great epistemological value in examining the British reception of nuclear winter. Since this theory emerged from a group of American astrophysicists and atmospheric scientists around Carl Sagan and was later refined with input from Soviet scientists, historians have so far analysed it, by and large, within the context of the two superpowers, especially the United States (Badash, 2009, p. 141;Rubinson, 2014;Mausbach, 2017;Knoblauch, 2017a, pp. 34-59 observation that multiple and often contradictory "trajectories" were characteristic of 1980s Britain (Brooke, 2014, p. 22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there has been a fair number of publications on the period of the so-called Second Cold War and the final phase of the Cold War generally (e.g.,Conze, Klimke, & Varon, 2017;Njølstad, 2004;Nuti et al, 2015), this historiography has often marginalized Britain, focusing instead on the two superpowers, especially the United States(Rossinow, 2015;Knoblauch, 2017a;Martin, 2011;Rubinson, 2014; Shaw, 2007, pp. 267-300; Shaw & Youngblood, 2010, pp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%