2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3160547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Global Cropland Footprint of the Non-Food Bioeconomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to truncation, biophysical accounting models are unable to trace non-food use of biomass to final consumers, constituting a severe drawback in assessing footprints of crops that are primarily for industrial and energy purposes such as vegetable oil. In order to exploit the advantages of both frameworks some authors link biophysical flows into non-food industries with a monetary EEMRIO (Weinzettel et al 2013, Bruckner et al 2018. However, highly processed food which embodies a large share of global vegetable oil production still cannot be traced sufficiently, as FAO supply-utilization accounts do not account for trade of oils embodied in these foods (FAO Statistics Division 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to truncation, biophysical accounting models are unable to trace non-food use of biomass to final consumers, constituting a severe drawback in assessing footprints of crops that are primarily for industrial and energy purposes such as vegetable oil. In order to exploit the advantages of both frameworks some authors link biophysical flows into non-food industries with a monetary EEMRIO (Weinzettel et al 2013, Bruckner et al 2018. However, highly processed food which embodies a large share of global vegetable oil production still cannot be traced sufficiently, as FAO supply-utilization accounts do not account for trade of oils embodied in these foods (FAO Statistics Division 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For further research on MFs, we conclude that the material‐intensive sectors and supply chains should be a priority in the further development of GMRIO models and databases that calculate MF indicators. In addition to further aligning construction procedures in monetary MRIO modeling, one future option is to exploit the growing body of global data sets in physical units, which allow tracing flows of primary materials in physical units (Bruckner, Giljum, Fischer, Tramberend, & Börner, ; Ewing et al., ). Future work could test whether detailed and reliable physical accounts for the first stages of processing can be established on the global level, allowing circumventing those sectors in the GMRIO databases that were identified as causing the highest deviations in MFs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%