2013
DOI: 10.4007/annals.2013.177.2.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The GIT stability of polarized varieties via discrepancy

Abstract: We prove that various GIT semistabilities of polarized varieties imply semi-log-canonicity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
100
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(40 reference statements)
4
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In what follows we shall tacitly identify trueT̂ with double-struckT and trueĜ with double-struckG. Definition A smooth double-struckT ‐compatible Kähler test configuration (X,A,ρ,T) for (X,α,T) is called trivial if it is given by (scriptX0=X×double-struckP1,scriptA0=πXα+πP1false[ω FS false],T) and C‐action ρ0false(τfalse)false(x,zfalse)=false(x,τzfalse) for any τdouble-struckC and false(x,zfalse)X×double-struckP1; product if it is given by (scriptX prod ,scriptA prod ,ρ prod ,T) where X prod is the compactification (in the sense of , see also [, Example 2.8; , p. 12–13]) of X×C with C‐action ρ prod false(τfalse)false(x<...>…”
Section: The (Vw)‐futaki Invariant Of a Smooth Test Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In what follows we shall tacitly identify trueT̂ with double-struckT and trueĜ with double-struckG. Definition A smooth double-struckT ‐compatible Kähler test configuration (X,A,ρ,T) for (X,α,T) is called trivial if it is given by (scriptX0=X×double-struckP1,scriptA0=πXα+πP1false[ω FS false],T) and C‐action ρ0false(τfalse)false(x,zfalse)=false(x,τzfalse) for any τdouble-struckC and false(x,zfalse)X×double-struckP1; product if it is given by (scriptX prod ,scriptA prod ,ρ prod ,T) where X prod is the compactification (in the sense of , see also [, Example 2.8; , p. 12–13]) of X×C with C‐action ρ prod false(τfalse)false(x<...>…”
Section: The (Vw)‐futaki Invariant Of a Smooth Test Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See [26] for a discussion and [49] for a recent example. Theorem 5.2.1 is an instance of this principle, and it works especially nicely because hyperplanes B i are linear subvarieties.…”
Section: Semi-log Canonical Singularities and Gitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roughly speaking, assuming the non-semi-log-canonicity of X, Odaka [Odaka11] proved that we can construct "destabilizing test configuration" by using the semi-logcanonical model of X. We refer to [Odaka11] for more details.…”
Section: Corollary 11 (Inversion Of Adjunction) Let (X D + δ) Be Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [Odaka11], the first named author proved K-semi-stability implies semi-log canonicity, assuming the existence of semi-log-canonical models. Since (1.2) verifies this assumption, the following theorem now becomes unconditional.…”
Section: Corollary 11 (Inversion Of Adjunction) Let (X D + δ) Be Amentioning
confidence: 99%