2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10711-011-9626-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Gieseker-Petri divisor in $${\mathcal{M}_g}$$ for g ≤ 13

Abstract: The Gieseker-Petri locus G P g is defined as the locus inside M g consisting of curves which violate the Gieseker-Petri Theorem. It is known that G P g has always some divisorial components and it has been conjectured that it is of pure codimension 1 inside M g . We prove that this holds true for genus up to 13.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, if h 0 (S, N ) 2, then the linear series N ⊗ O C contributes to the Clifford index of C ∈ |L| s . Furthermore, inequality (18), together with the fact that c 1 (N 2 ) 2 < 0 c 1 (N 1 ) 2 , implies that c 1 (N 2 ) · c 1 (N ) > c 1 (N 1 ) · c 1 (N ). We obtain c 1 (N 2 ) · c 1 (N ) > 1 2 c 1 (N ) · (c 1 (N 1 ) + c 1 (N 2 )), and we are in case (c) It remains to treat the case where both h 0 (S, N 2 ) < 2 and h 0 (S, N ) < 2.…”
Section: Lm Bundles Of Rank 3 Which Are Not μ L -Stablementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, if h 0 (S, N ) 2, then the linear series N ⊗ O C contributes to the Clifford index of C ∈ |L| s . Furthermore, inequality (18), together with the fact that c 1 (N 2 ) 2 < 0 c 1 (N 1 ) 2 , implies that c 1 (N 2 ) · c 1 (N ) > c 1 (N 1 ) · c 1 (N ). We obtain c 1 (N 2 ) · c 1 (N ) > 1 2 c 1 (N ) · (c 1 (N 1 ) + c 1 (N 2 )), and we are in case (c) It remains to treat the case where both h 0 (S, N 2 ) < 2 and h 0 (S, N ) < 2.…”
Section: Lm Bundles Of Rank 3 Which Are Not μ L -Stablementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recall that GP 11 has pure codimension 1 in M 11 (cf. [18]) and decomposes in the following way: GP 11 = M 2 11,9 ∪ GP 2 11,10 ∪ 10 d=7 GP 1 11,d , where M 2 11,9 is a Brill-Noether divisor. Therefore, proving the transversality of N L 4 11,13 and GP 11 is equivalent to showing that in the above situation, if C ∈ |L| is general, then C has no g 2 9 and the varieties G 2 10 (C) and G 1 d (C) for 7 d 10 are smooth of the expected dimension.…”
Section: Transversality Of Some Brill-noether Locimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We summarize some inclusions holding in any genus (cf. Section 2 in [LC1]): Proposition 2.1. One has that:…”
Section: Components Of the Gieseker-petri Locusmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…and M r+1 g,d+1 ⊂ GP r g,d (proceed as in the proof of [LC1,Lem. 2.5] and, in the case where the g r d−1 or the g r+1 d+1 on the curve C is not primitive, use a general point of C in order to construct a g r d ).…”
Section: Components Of the Gieseker-petri Locusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation