2021
DOI: 10.1080/2156857x.2021.1937289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

”The ’Ghetto’ strikes back: resisting welfare sanctions and stigmatizing categorizations in marginalized residential areas in Denmark”

Abstract: Contribution to special issue of NSWR: Community work in Nordic welfare states in transitionconditions, dilemmas and directions "The 'Ghetto' Strikes back: Resisting welfare sanctions and stigmatizing categorizations in marginalized

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 The area is obliged to undergo demolition, permanent relocation of a proportion of residents, reconstruction and partial privatization if the housing area is unable to change the composition of sociodemographic characteristics of the residents within five years. 26 In this study, we refer to this process as urban regeneration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 The area is obliged to undergo demolition, permanent relocation of a proportion of residents, reconstruction and partial privatization if the housing area is unable to change the composition of sociodemographic characteristics of the residents within five years. 26 In this study, we refer to this process as urban regeneration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 summarizes the actual counts of the two DST population datasets along with the mean density of each of the subgroups in four selected municipalities in the capital region. Copenhagen and Frederiksberg were the two most densely populated municipalities in terms of total population; Brøndby and Ishøj had the highest density of non-Western migrants, sparking debates about ghettos and the emergence of "parallel societies" (Fallov & Birk, 2022;Lundsteen, 2023). Counts by demographic group are shown as a reference to indicate the anticipated differences between the aggregated and grid cell datasets provided.…”
Section: Materials Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, many studies have analysed the Danish ‘ghetto’ politics and marginalized housing in general through this conceptual lens (e.g. Birk and Fallov, 2021; Fabian and Lund Hansen, 2020; Fallov and Birk, 2022; Jensen et al, 2021; Jensen and Christensen, 2012; Olsen and Larsen, 2022). While some have highlighted the relation between territorial stigmatization and housing markets (Schultz Larsen, 2014, 2018) or sales (Jensen, 2021), these studies have generally not had non-profit housing commodification as their main concern (see, however, Risager, 2022).…”
Section: Denmark's ‘Ghetto’ Politics and Its Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ‘ghetto’ discourse, then, was supplemented with quantifiable criteria and geographic demarcations – a political move that exemplifies how territorial stigmatization might be produced not only through language but also through ‘objective’ statistical and geospatial data (Crookes, 2017; Sisson, 2021; Uitermark et al, 2017). The result was a ‘scientification’ or, what Schultz Larsen (2018: 1144) calls, ‘an extensive bureaucratization of territorial stigmatization’ that helped empower the government to bring the ‘ghetto’ into being (see also Birk and Elmholdt, 2020; Fallov and Birk, 2022).…”
Section: From ‘Ghettoization’ To the ‘Ghetto List’ In The 2010smentioning
confidence: 99%