2013
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2013.47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The GFR and GFR decline cannot be accurately estimated in type 2 diabetics

Abstract: There are no adequate studies that have formally tested the performance of different estimating formulas in patients with type 2 diabetes both with and without overt nephropathy. Here we evaluated the agreement between baseline GFRs, GFR changes at month 6, and long-term GFR decline measured by iohexol plasma clearance or estimated by 15 creatinine-based formulas in 600 type 2 diabetics followed for a median of 4.0 years. Ninety patients were hyperfiltering. The number of those identified by estimation formula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

7
101
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(44 reference statements)
7
101
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported rates were between 4.5 and 6.6 mL/min/1.73 m 2 /year (30-33). It is wellknown that eGFR and decline in eGFR underestimate the real GFR values (34,35). Furthermore, the studies differ in definition of DN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported rates were between 4.5 and 6.6 mL/min/1.73 m 2 /year (30-33). It is wellknown that eGFR and decline in eGFR underestimate the real GFR values (34,35). Furthermore, the studies differ in definition of DN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 In addition, the eGFR needs to be interpreted with caution in patients with diabetes (e.g., all patients in the VITAL trial), because a recent study showed poor agreement between eGFR and measured GFR. 48 Clearly, future randomized trials are needed to address the efficacy and safety of active vitamin D analogs on hard end points, such as doubling of serum creatinine, ESRD, and all-cause and cardiovascular events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this study had several limitations. The health status of the subjects was poorly described and an unknown number had type 2 diabetes, a disorder known to have a marked influence on GFR, even in the absence of proteinuria [10] . Moreover, GFR itself was not measured and 24 h endogenous Ccr is no longer recommended to estimate GFR because of lack of precision and high intra-individual, between test variation [11] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%