2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2014.10.001
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The germline CDH1 c.48 G > C substitution contributes to cancer predisposition through generation of a pro-invasive mutation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, assessment of non-truncating sequence variants in tumor suppressor genes can be challenging when these changes are subtle and are unknown to alter function sufficiently to predispose to cancer development. Although the focus is usually placed on its effects on protein structure and function, single nucleotide substitutions within exons can also have significant impact on mRNA processing, and disrupt protein function [7, 8]. Substitution mutations and synonymous alterations should always be studied for their potentials to disrupt pre-mRNA splicing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, assessment of non-truncating sequence variants in tumor suppressor genes can be challenging when these changes are subtle and are unknown to alter function sufficiently to predispose to cancer development. Although the focus is usually placed on its effects on protein structure and function, single nucleotide substitutions within exons can also have significant impact on mRNA processing, and disrupt protein function [7, 8]. Substitution mutations and synonymous alterations should always be studied for their potentials to disrupt pre-mRNA splicing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that purpose, cell-based graphs (networks) were created using images of DAPI-stained cells and connecting triplets of neighbouring cells. An efficient analytical pipeline for the network was then developed and validated in a well-known model of loss of cell adhesiveness 15 16 20 21 22 23 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To verify the impact of the variant in vitro, we addressed protein expression and localization, and the two main functions of E-cadherin: the ability to establish cell-cell adhesion and its role as an invasion suppressor. These are well-recognized approaches to ascertain the pathogenicity of E-cadherin missense changes [7][8][9][10][11]. With these analyses, we demonstrated that the p.(T560R) change caused a decrease in protein levels and an abnormal pattern of expression in the cytoplasm (distinct from the correct plasma membrane localization), possibly due to an impairment of Nglycosylation of E-cadherin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%