2022
DOI: 10.1027/2698-1866/a000025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The German Version of the Hybrid Work Characteristics Scale

Abstract: Abstract. Introduction: To account for fast-paced developments at work, hybrid work characteristics (HWCs) were introduced. To measure them, an English instrument was developed by Xie et al. (2019) . HWCs encompass more than one work characteristics domain such as the task, social, or contextual domain and include boundarylessness, multitasking, the demand for constant learning, and non-work-related interruptions and are associated with employee attitudes and well-being. Objectives: We validated a German trans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measures researched capture, for example, cognitive abilities (Brauer et al, 2022; Dahm, 2022; Gnambs et al, 2021; Golino et al, 2021; Krieger et al, 2021), clinically relevant traits (Adhiatma & Halim, 2021; Ching et al, 2021; Lorenz & Algner, 2021), or personality traits (Dierickx et al, 2020; Gallardo-Pujol, Rouco, et al., 2022; Rouco et al, 2022). In addition, specific assessment contexts come from, for example, the educational area (Gnambs et al, 2021) or industrial and organizational psychology (Mitropoulou & Zampetakis, 2022; Nitzschner et al, 2022; Paruzel et al, 2022). Not surprisingly, many papers offer shortened or short test versions of established measures (Gallardo-Pujol, Rouco, et al, 2022; Krieger et al, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measures researched capture, for example, cognitive abilities (Brauer et al, 2022; Dahm, 2022; Gnambs et al, 2021; Golino et al, 2021; Krieger et al, 2021), clinically relevant traits (Adhiatma & Halim, 2021; Ching et al, 2021; Lorenz & Algner, 2021), or personality traits (Dierickx et al, 2020; Gallardo-Pujol, Rouco, et al., 2022; Rouco et al, 2022). In addition, specific assessment contexts come from, for example, the educational area (Gnambs et al, 2021) or industrial and organizational psychology (Mitropoulou & Zampetakis, 2022; Nitzschner et al, 2022; Paruzel et al, 2022). Not surprisingly, many papers offer shortened or short test versions of established measures (Gallardo-Pujol, Rouco, et al, 2022; Krieger et al, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%