2020
DOI: 10.3205/zma001325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The German interprofessional attitudes scale: translation, cultural adaptation, and validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a secondary qualitative analysis of a mixed-methods quantitative-qualitative design study based on a sequential explanatory model (Berger-Estilita et al, 2020a). Six hundred and eighty-three medical students from all 6 years of medical studies at the University of Bern, Switzerland replied to an online survey about attitudes toward interprofessional learning using a validated interprofessional attitudes scale (Pedersen et al, 2020). After completion of the online survey, students could tick a box signalling their availability to participate in semi-structured group interviews.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a secondary qualitative analysis of a mixed-methods quantitative-qualitative design study based on a sequential explanatory model (Berger-Estilita et al, 2020a). Six hundred and eighty-three medical students from all 6 years of medical studies at the University of Bern, Switzerland replied to an online survey about attitudes toward interprofessional learning using a validated interprofessional attitudes scale (Pedersen et al, 2020). After completion of the online survey, students could tick a box signalling their availability to participate in semi-structured group interviews.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…validity index (CVI), into the cognitive debriefing phase according to recommendations byPedersen et al (2020). To calculate itemlevel CVI (I-CVI) values, experts assessed the content relevance of each item on a four-point Likert scale (1: not relevant; 2: somewhat relevant; 3: quite relevant; 4: highly relevant).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%