2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2005.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Gerasimov–Drell–Hearn sum rule

Abstract: ∞ 0 dν ν σ 3/2 (ν) − σ 1/2 (ν) = 2π 2 α m 2 κ 2 (1)Abstract Sum rules measurements involving the spin structure of the nucleon like those due to Bjorken, Ellis and Jaffe and the one due to Gerasimov, Drell and Hearn allow to study the structure of strong interactions. At long distance scales in the confinement regime the Gerasimov-Drell-Hearn (GDH) Sum Rule (Eq. (1)) connects static properties of the nucleon -like the anomalous magnetic moment and the nucleon mass -with the difference of spin dependent doubly … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
(202 reference statements)
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(24) was modified to allow a smooth connection to a finite value at the real photon point, Q 2 = 0. The seven parameters of this function were optimized by fitting this function to all world data at W > 2 GeV and the fit function, including real photon data from ELSA and MAMI (see, e.g., the summary by Helbing [116]). Each experiment was given an adjustable normalization factor as an additional parameter which was allowed to vary within the stated uncertainty due to global scale factors like the product P b P t .…”
Section: The Spin Structure Function G Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(24) was modified to allow a smooth connection to a finite value at the real photon point, Q 2 = 0. The seven parameters of this function were optimized by fitting this function to all world data at W > 2 GeV and the fit function, including real photon data from ELSA and MAMI (see, e.g., the summary by Helbing [116]). Each experiment was given an adjustable normalization factor as an additional parameter which was allowed to vary within the stated uncertainty due to global scale factors like the product P b P t .…”
Section: The Spin Structure Function G Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goodness of the fit (χ 2 ) was calculated by comparing the fit functions for neutron asymmetries directly with neutron results extracted from 3 He data, as well as comparing the convolu- tion of our proton and neutron models with corresponding deuteron data. To anchor our fit of A 1 at the photon point, we used data from ELSA and MAMI (see, e.g., the summary by Helbing [98]). As a result, we achieved a consistent fit of proton, deuteron and neutron data over a wide kinematic range, far exceeding our own kinematic coverage.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep inelastic scattering experiments have revealed gluonic contributions to the proton spin to be consistent with zero, at least within the admittedly large errors [2]. At low energies, a different aspect of the proton spin structure is tested by a comparison of the helicity dependence of the total γp cross section integrated over all photon energies, ∞ 0 dE γ (σ 3/2 − σ 1/2 )/E γ , with the proton magnetic moment [3], a relation which is known as Gerasimov-Drell-Hearn (GDH) sum rule [4,5]. The subscripts denote the total helicity, h = 1/2 for photon and proton spin anti-aligned, h = 3/2 for both spins aligned.…”
Section: Pacs Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution of single π 0 production to the GDH integral is evaluated. The total GDH integral up to 2.9 GeV was determined to I 2.9 tot = 226 ± 5 stat ± 12 syst µb [23][24][25][26][27]; the results were summarized in [3]. Here, a contribution of 27.5 µb had been subtracted to account for the description of the very low energy region by MAID [8].…”
Section: Pacs Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%