2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2016.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The GEP: Crowd-Sourcing Big Data Analysis with Undergraduates

Abstract: The era of 'big data' is also the era of abundant data, creating new opportunities for student-scientist research partnerships. By coordinating undergraduate efforts, the Genomics Education Partnership produces high-quality annotated data sets and analyses that could not be generated otherwise, leading to scientific publications while providing many students with research experience.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We deliberately use the term "crowd-training" instead of "crowdsourcing" to acknowledge that a training component is required before individuals could perform the specific type of neuroanatomical mapping techniques we describe here. Given that crowd-trained individuals (students in CUREs) have helped advance big-data projects in the field of genome annotation (Chen et al, 2005;Call et al, 2007;Elgin et al, 2016), and that certain projects within the subdomains of pathology (Della Mea et al, 2014) and neuroanatomy (Roskams & Popović, 2016;Irshad et al, 2017; also see Oleson, 2011) have been crowdsourced successfully outside of a formal CURE environment, we reasoned that it was possible to develop, implement, and evaluate a CURE that provided students the means to conduct authentic scientific research in atlas-based neuroanatomical mapping. Accordingly, with the support of a grant from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) (Grant 52008125), we created an introductory biology CURE called Brain Mapping & Connectomics (BM&C), the first CURE of its kind in the country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We deliberately use the term "crowd-training" instead of "crowdsourcing" to acknowledge that a training component is required before individuals could perform the specific type of neuroanatomical mapping techniques we describe here. Given that crowd-trained individuals (students in CUREs) have helped advance big-data projects in the field of genome annotation (Chen et al, 2005;Call et al, 2007;Elgin et al, 2016), and that certain projects within the subdomains of pathology (Della Mea et al, 2014) and neuroanatomy (Roskams & Popović, 2016;Irshad et al, 2017; also see Oleson, 2011) have been crowdsourced successfully outside of a formal CURE environment, we reasoned that it was possible to develop, implement, and evaluate a CURE that provided students the means to conduct authentic scientific research in atlas-based neuroanatomical mapping. Accordingly, with the support of a grant from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) (Grant 52008125), we created an introductory biology CURE called Brain Mapping & Connectomics (BM&C), the first CURE of its kind in the country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This real-time data-abundance revolution has positively impacted public health (Khoury et al, 2014; Murdoch et al, 2013) and public health policy (Athey, 2017; Beam et al, 2018). As a result, the university community has escalated its graduate and undergraduate data-science curriculum to include big-data analysis tools to advance the understanding of the trends in social lifestyle diseases (Elgin et al, 2017; De Veaux et al, 2017). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of crowdsourcing using accurate sensor data was successfully conveyed through the RLO. Crowdsourcing, where the public can help increase the density of data, is an increasingly important method of collecting and analyzing "big data" for scientific research (Elgin et al, 2017). Through the RLO and classroom exercise, students not only learned about crowdsourcing, but learned through participation in this type of data collection as part of the active learning exercise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%