2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2016.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The geometry of sporadic C-embeddings into C2

Abstract: A closed algebraic embedding of C * = C 1 \ {0} into C 2 is sporadic if for every curve A ⊆ C 2 isomorphic to an affine line the intersection with C * is at least 2. Non-sporadic embeddings have been classified. There are very few known sporadic embeddings. We establish geometric and algebraic tools to classify them based on the analysis of the minimal log resolution (X, D) → (P 2 , U ), where U is the closure of C * on P 2 . We show in particular that one can choose coordinates on C 2 in which the type at inf… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark (a)If A is as in Lemma (d) then E¯π0false(Afalse)double-struckP2π0false(Afalse) is the image of a proper injective morphism double-struckCdouble-struckC2. Such images are classified in in case when they are smooth and in under some regularity conditions. (b)If A is as in Lemma (g) then π0false(Afalse) is a line which is a good asymptote in the sense of for the above C‐embedding. …”
Section: Possible Types Of Cuspsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark (a)If A is as in Lemma (d) then E¯π0false(Afalse)double-struckP2π0false(Afalse) is the image of a proper injective morphism double-struckCdouble-struckC2. Such images are classified in in case when they are smooth and in under some regularity conditions. (b)If A is as in Lemma (g) then π0false(Afalse) is a line which is a good asymptote in the sense of for the above C‐embedding. …”
Section: Possible Types Of Cuspsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such images are classified in [5,16] in case when they are smooth and in [4] under some regularity conditions.…”
Section: It Follows Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark It is possible, and in some situations more convenient to allow more general choices of Z1 or Yj for j1, which do not satisfy (running inductive arguments more smoothly is one of the reasons). For instance, instead of we could ask Yj to satisfy pjcj (as it is done in ), which results in replacing all pairs ()cjpj where pj>cj with sequences ()cjcjrj0ptcjpjrjcj, where rj is the integer part of pj/cj and 0ptccr means ()cc repeated r times. Additionally, we could allow a more general choice of Z1, which will relax the condition p1c1.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that after the first three blowups, the cusp meets the last exceptional curve with multiplicity 2. Therefore (see the discussion preceding ), if we used HN‐pairs as in instead of the standard ones, namely, if we required that p2c2 and thus chose some general smooth germ Y2 transversal to the last exceptional curve instead of the maximally tangent one, then the HN‐type would be 0pt640pt220pt21. The fact that we have two Puiseux pairs (equivalently, that the Puiseux sequence is of length 3) corresponds to the fact that the exceptional divisor over q1 has one branching component.…”
Section: Appendix Comparison Of Other Numerical Characteristics Of Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interesting case of Theorem 1, for k " C, is thus the description of AutpA 2 , Γq when Γ is isomorphic to C˚(or a union of such curves). Note that there exist only partial classifications of the closed embeddings of C˚into A 2 , which are moreover very involved (see [CNKR09], [BŻa10] and more recently [KPR14]). Hence, one cannot check a few cases to derive Theorem 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%