2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-4381-7_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Geometry of Semidefinite Programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using known results on the positive semidefinite cone (see, e.g., Pataki [19]), one can also show the following. We omit the proofs for brevity.…”
Section: All Of These Vectors Lie In K(v S) the Correspondingmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Using known results on the positive semidefinite cone (see, e.g., Pataki [19]), one can also show the following. We omit the proofs for brevity.…”
Section: All Of These Vectors Lie In K(v S) the Correspondingmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…see, for instance, (3.2.8) and (3.2.10) in Pataki [18]. Plugging these into (22) gives (i), as required.…”
Section: But (20) Impliesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…To establish closedness, we need to first verify that for a pair of positive semidefinite matrices x ū ,ū ∈ ri face x K , i.e., they are strictly complementary (see Alizadeh et al [1], or Pataki [18]). Ifū is of the form…”
Section: But (20) Impliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smaller the dimension of tan(X, K), the higher the non-smoothness ("kinkiness") of K at X . For a so-called nice cone (see Pataki 2000Pataki , 2013Roshchina 2014), the relation J (X ) ⊥ = tan(X, K) holds.…”
Section: Example 38 [Sdp Withmentioning
confidence: 99%