2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39289-4_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Geometric Local Textural Patterns (GLTP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other than our proposed textural model, we evaluated the robustness and efficiency of our HPIL model in comparison with other existing texture descriptors using our VELscope ® database, such as gradient directional pattern (GDP) [ 60 ], gradient directional pattern 2 (GDP2), geometric local textural patterns (GLTP) [ 61 ], improved Weber local descriptor (IWLD) [ 62 ], localized angular phase (LAP) [ 63 ], local binary pattern (LBP) [ 64 ], local directional pattern (LDIP) [ 65 ], local directional pattern variance (LDiPv), inverse difference moment standardized (IDN) [ 66 ], local directional number pattern (LDNP) [ 67 ], local gradient increasing pattern (LGIP) [ 68 ], local gradient patterns (LGP) [ 69 ], local phase quantization (LPQ) [ 70 ], local ternary pattern (LTeP) [ 71 ], local tetra pattern (LTrP) [ 72 ], monogenic binary coding (MBC) [ 73 ], local frequency descriptor (LFD) [ 74 ], and local mapped pattern (LMP) [ 75 ]; however, the overall results with these textural descriptors were quite modest (as shown in Table 5 ) as compared to those obtained with our HPIL model, which makes it not suitable for classifying OPMD and standard regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other than our proposed textural model, we evaluated the robustness and efficiency of our HPIL model in comparison with other existing texture descriptors using our VELscope ® database, such as gradient directional pattern (GDP) [ 60 ], gradient directional pattern 2 (GDP2), geometric local textural patterns (GLTP) [ 61 ], improved Weber local descriptor (IWLD) [ 62 ], localized angular phase (LAP) [ 63 ], local binary pattern (LBP) [ 64 ], local directional pattern (LDIP) [ 65 ], local directional pattern variance (LDiPv), inverse difference moment standardized (IDN) [ 66 ], local directional number pattern (LDNP) [ 67 ], local gradient increasing pattern (LGIP) [ 68 ], local gradient patterns (LGP) [ 69 ], local phase quantization (LPQ) [ 70 ], local ternary pattern (LTeP) [ 71 ], local tetra pattern (LTrP) [ 72 ], monogenic binary coding (MBC) [ 73 ], local frequency descriptor (LFD) [ 74 ], and local mapped pattern (LMP) [ 75 ]; however, the overall results with these textural descriptors were quite modest (as shown in Table 5 ) as compared to those obtained with our HPIL model, which makes it not suitable for classifying OPMD and standard regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, 2994 quantitative radiomic features were extracted from the CECT images. The definition and implementation of the features have been described in recent studies 18,19 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%