1977
DOI: 10.1029/js082i028p04439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The geology of the Viking Lander 1 site

Abstract: Viking 1 landed on volcanic terrain in the plains of Chryse. Stereo pictures reveal an undulating topography. Bedrock is exposed along several ridge crests. Blocks are more numerous than can be attributed to impact ejecta. The presence of an apparent variety of rock types suggests in situ weathering of extrusive and near‐surface basaltic igneous rocks along a linear volcanic vent. Fine‐grained sediment is present in drift complexes and isolated drifts. During the course of the Viking mission a small patch of f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
86
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The crusty-to-cloddy material was similar to the blocky material in that it appeared to consist of cemented grains of finer material but seemed more consolidated. The overall conclusion that was reached at the time of the Viking landings was that the geological processes that were identified from orbiter images could not be identified uniquely from lander images [Masursky and Crabill, 1976a,b;Binder et al, 1977;Mutch et al, 1977]. That is, the processes that were responsible for the 100-m-scale features were not necessarily the same as those that were responsible for the decimeter-and meterscale features.…”
Section: Geology Of the Viking Landing Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crusty-to-cloddy material was similar to the blocky material in that it appeared to consist of cemented grains of finer material but seemed more consolidated. The overall conclusion that was reached at the time of the Viking landings was that the geological processes that were identified from orbiter images could not be identified uniquely from lander images [Masursky and Crabill, 1976a,b;Binder et al, 1977;Mutch et al, 1977]. That is, the processes that were responsible for the 100-m-scale features were not necessarily the same as those that were responsible for the decimeter-and meterscale features.…”
Section: Geology Of the Viking Landing Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obtaining such information in situ on a planetary surface requires a capable Raman spectrometer, a good means for its deployment, and that the surface of the rock be accessible. Dust was present on the rocks observed by the Pathfinder and Viking missions [Golornbek et al, 1997; Binder et al, 1977;Mutch et al, 1977]. This dust did not cover most rocks uniformly, and the sensor of the spectrometer could possibly be guided to a relatively dust-poor location.…”
Section: Mineral Proportionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On Mars, the rocks at the Viking 1 site are thought to be a partially covered and eroded lava flow surface, although ejecta from craters and flood deposits have also been suggested from the apparent diversity of rock types at this site [Binder et al, 1977]. Viking 2 rocks are likely ejecta from the nearby large crater Mie [Mutch et al, 1977].…”
Section: Earth and Mars Rock Size-frequency Distribution Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%