2021
DOI: 10.1111/1755-6724.14652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Geological Significance of the Deformation and Geochronology of the Xiaotian–Mozitan Shear Zone in the Dabie Orogenic Belt (East‐Central China)

Abstract: The Xiaotian-Mozitan Shear Zone (XMSZ) is the boundary between the North Huaiyang Tectonic Belt and the Dabie High-grade Metamorphic Complex (DHMC). It trends WNW-ESE and extends more than 170 km from Qingshan Town in Anhui's Jinzhai County in the west, via Mozitan Town in Huoshan County, to Xiaotian Town in Shucheng County, truncated by the Tan-Lu Fault in Tongcheng County in the east. This shear zone plays a key role in understanding the evolution of the Dabie Orogenic Belt (DOB) because of its close correla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
(158 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zircon U–Pb dating reveals that the Dabie Orogen displays four primary age groups, with peaks occurring at 2490, 1850, 746 and 412 Ma (Figure 13a; Chen & Xing, 2016; Cheng et al, 2009; Dai et al, 2016; Gao et al, 2002, 2013, 2016; Hacker et al, 1998; He et al, 2011; Huang et al, 2021; Jian et al, 2000; Li et al, 2018; Li, Yu, et al, 2016; Liu, Liu, et al, 2017; Liu et al, 2007; Liu, 2018; Liu et al, 2008, Liu, Gao, et al, 2010,Liu, Jahn, et al, 2010, Liu et al, 2011, Liu et al, 2012; Liu, Yan, & Wang, 2017; Qiu et al, 2020; Sun et al, 2002; Tong et al, 2022; Tuo et al, 2022; Wu & Zheng, 2013; Wu et al, 2008, 2009; Xiang et al, 2012; Xu et al, 2007; Zhang et al, 2020; Zhao et al, 2004, 2007; Zhao et al, 2014, 2016; Zhao, Zhu, Wu, et al, 2021, Zhao, Zhu, Ye, et al, 2021). Within the Jiangnan Orogen, zircon U–Pb dating identifies the primary age group at 846 Ma, accompanied by secondary age groups around 2000 and 2500 Ma (Figure 13b; Chen et al, 2019; Li, Wang, et al, 2016; Meng et al, 2013; Su et al, 2014; Wang et al, 2012; Wang et al, 2014; Yan, Shu, et al, 2015; Yang et al, 2018; Yao, Cawood, et al, 2016; Yao, Shu, et al, 2016, 2019; Ye et al, 2007; Yin et al, 2013; Yu et al, 2020; Zhang et al, 2012; Zhang, Li, & Santosh, 2013; Zhang, Wang, et al, 2013; Zhao & Zhou, …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zircon U–Pb dating reveals that the Dabie Orogen displays four primary age groups, with peaks occurring at 2490, 1850, 746 and 412 Ma (Figure 13a; Chen & Xing, 2016; Cheng et al, 2009; Dai et al, 2016; Gao et al, 2002, 2013, 2016; Hacker et al, 1998; He et al, 2011; Huang et al, 2021; Jian et al, 2000; Li et al, 2018; Li, Yu, et al, 2016; Liu, Liu, et al, 2017; Liu et al, 2007; Liu, 2018; Liu et al, 2008, Liu, Gao, et al, 2010,Liu, Jahn, et al, 2010, Liu et al, 2011, Liu et al, 2012; Liu, Yan, & Wang, 2017; Qiu et al, 2020; Sun et al, 2002; Tong et al, 2022; Tuo et al, 2022; Wu & Zheng, 2013; Wu et al, 2008, 2009; Xiang et al, 2012; Xu et al, 2007; Zhang et al, 2020; Zhao et al, 2004, 2007; Zhao et al, 2014, 2016; Zhao, Zhu, Wu, et al, 2021, Zhao, Zhu, Ye, et al, 2021). Within the Jiangnan Orogen, zircon U–Pb dating identifies the primary age group at 846 Ma, accompanied by secondary age groups around 2000 and 2500 Ma (Figure 13b; Chen et al, 2019; Li, Wang, et al, 2016; Meng et al, 2013; Su et al, 2014; Wang et al, 2012; Wang et al, 2014; Yan, Shu, et al, 2015; Yang et al, 2018; Yao, Cawood, et al, 2016; Yao, Shu, et al, 2016, 2019; Ye et al, 2007; Yin et al, 2013; Yu et al, 2020; Zhang et al, 2012; Zhang, Li, & Santosh, 2013; Zhang, Wang, et al, 2013; Zhao & Zhou, …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Ma (Figure 13a;Chen & Xing, 2016;Cheng et al, 2009;Dai et al, 2016;Gao et al, 2002Gao et al, , 2013Gao et al, , 2016Hacker et al, 1998;He et al, 2011;Huang et al, 2021;Jian et al, 2000;Li et al, 2018;Li, Yu, et al, 2016;Liu et al, 2007;Liu, 2018;Liu et al, 2008, Liu, Gao, et al, 2010,Liu, Jahn, et al, 2010, Liuet al, 2011, Liu et al, 2012Liu, Yan, & Wang, 2017;Qiu et al, 2020;Sun et al, 2002;Tong et al, 2022;Tuo et al, 2022;Wu & Zheng, 2013;Wu et al, 2008Wu et al, , 2009Xiang et al, 2012;Xu et al, 2007;Zhang et al, 2020;Zhao et al, 2004Zhao et al, , 2007Zhao et al, 2014Zhao et al, , 2016Zhao, Zhu, Wu, et al, 2021. Within the Jiangnan Orogen, zircon U-Pb dating identifies the primary age group at 846 Ma, accompanied by secondary age groups around 2000 and 2500 Ma (Figure13b;Chen et al, 2019;Li, Wang, et al, 2016;Meng et al, 2013;Su et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2014;Yan, Shu, et al, 2015;…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Regionally, extensional structures, such as MCC type extensional gneissic domes, detachment faults, and extensionrelated basins, are widespread from Trans-Baikal to SCB, over more than 3,000 km along the eastern Asian continent (Figure 14) (Huang et al, 2021;Lin et al, 2015;Zhou et al, 2012). These extensional structures exhibit a consistent NW-SE oriented maximum stretching direction.…”
Section: Geodynamics and Structural Evolution For Ndcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The position of the Shangdan suture in the Dabie Orogen remains controversial (Liu et al, 2013;Wu and Zheng, 2013;Huang et al, 2016Huang et al, , 2021. And thus, whether the Huwan complex is affiliated to the Yangtze Block or the North China Block is still relatively uncertain (Wu et al, 2009;Liu et al, 2011;Peters et al, 2013;Wu and Zheng, 2013).…”
Section: Tectonic Characteristics Of the Huwan Complex 631 Is The Huw...mentioning
confidence: 99%