2017
DOI: 10.1177/0309132517739142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The geographies of social finance: Poverty regulation through the ‘invisible heart’ of markets

Abstract: The global financial and anti-poverty industries are embracing an investment philosophy called social finance, which claims that private profit-making can create positive benefits for society. Attempting to resolve the problems of capitalism from within the system, social finance reframes finance as a force for engendering, rather than disrupting, the public good. This article argues that social finance raises theoretical concerns for geographical research on finance, poverty, and neoliberalizing capitalism. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Credit Suisse conference that opened this paper is aligned with the “impact investing” or “social finance” movement—investments that aim to return not only in money but also in other social and/or ecological benefits (e.g. Mitchell ; Rosenman ). This movement is part of the broader “millennial development” trend noted above but also linked to a rise in “millennial philanthropy” or philanthrocapitalism (Holmes ; Mitchell and Sparke ) where the super‐rich invest in mechanisms targeted at entrenched social and environmental problems.…”
Section: Encountering Conservation Finance: Conceptual and Methodsologmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Credit Suisse conference that opened this paper is aligned with the “impact investing” or “social finance” movement—investments that aim to return not only in money but also in other social and/or ecological benefits (e.g. Mitchell ; Rosenman ). This movement is part of the broader “millennial development” trend noted above but also linked to a rise in “millennial philanthropy” or philanthrocapitalism (Holmes ; Mitchell and Sparke ) where the super‐rich invest in mechanisms targeted at entrenched social and environmental problems.…”
Section: Encountering Conservation Finance: Conceptual and Methodsologmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contemporary push to make assets is animated by the possibility for new kinds of accumulation, but we do not agree that it is “first and foremost about capital; generating value that is of use in and to contemporary capitalism”, as Büscher (:33) argues. As Mitchell and Sparke () note about millennial philanthropy (see also Rosenman ), FPCF is also animated by recognition of fundamental problems in capitalism, as well as moral desires to “do good” and perhaps “right wrongs”; it is inspired less by Gordon Gekko than by Muhammad Yunus. Recognising difference in intent does not mean all is well.…”
Section: Encountering Conservation Finance: Conceptual and Methodsologmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These technologies take on different forms but work together as a constellation that keeps systems of value capture in motion. They include, but are not limited to: digital technologies like the data‐driven, networked, and algorithmic systems that comprise so‐called “smart” things (Sadowski ); legal technologies like intellectual property rights used to construct and control (im)material assets out of cognitive and biological substrate (Birch ; Zeller ); and financial technologies like derivatives, bonds, and risk indexes designed for the purpose of abstracting, valuing, and exchanging anything (Christophers ; Rosenman ). These various types of technologies overlap and intersect; the separations I make here are purely analytical.…”
Section: Platforming Rent Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors approach the social investment market through the lens of financialization -see, for example, Dowling (2017) andHarvie (forthcoming). Lake (2015Lake ( , 2016 explores the broader financialization of urban and municipal governance in the United States and the spatial concerns he raises are developed by Rosenman (2017), who highlights the "geographies of social finance". She points particularly to both the physical and social distance between investors and the "targets" of their investment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%