2012
DOI: 10.1134/s0742046312060036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The geochronology and origin of mantle sources for late cenozoic intraplate volcanism in the frontal part of the Arabian plate in the Karacadağ neovolcanic area of Turkey. Part 1. The results of isotope-geochronological studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our dataset contains a single new analysis from the Ovabağ Phase. The youth of these rocks makes their analysis more challenging, but sample DO-62 gave an isochron age of 0.29 ± 0.13 Ma, which is within the uncertainty of K/Ar measurements (Keskin et al, 2012a) and is consistent with the freshness of these flows.…”
Section: Ovabağ Phasesupporting
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our dataset contains a single new analysis from the Ovabağ Phase. The youth of these rocks makes their analysis more challenging, but sample DO-62 gave an isochron age of 0.29 ± 0.13 Ma, which is within the uncertainty of K/Ar measurements (Keskin et al, 2012a) and is consistent with the freshness of these flows.…”
Section: Ovabağ Phasesupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The isochron age of 1.41 ± 0.20 Ma for DK-25 lies within the range measured for groups K1 and K2. For DK-24, the isochron age of 4.50 ± 0.12 Ma suggests that this lava is slightly older than any of the other Karacadağ Phase lavas analysed either in this work or previously (Keskin et al, 2012a and references therein).…”
Section: Karacadağ Phasementioning
confidence: 42%
See 3 more Smart Citations