1994
DOI: 10.1292/jvms.56.985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Genotype of Aujeszky's Disease Viruses Isolated in Argentina.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Subtyping of the Argentinean field isolates of SuHV-1 (Serena et al, 2010) has clearly shown that all strains are genotype I, the same as that occurred in Central Europe (Herrmann et al, 1984), Northern Ireland (Todd and Mc Ferran, 1985), the United States (Ben-Porat et al, 1984;Pirtle et al, 1984), and New Zealand (Tisdall et al, 1988). Although only one strain isolated in Argentina and previously classified as genotype II has been isolated from animals imported from Holland (Echeverría et al, 1994), no new isolates belonging to genotype II have been reported since 1981. Previous reports mention that genotype II is common in Holland (Gielkens et al, 1985).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Subtyping of the Argentinean field isolates of SuHV-1 (Serena et al, 2010) has clearly shown that all strains are genotype I, the same as that occurred in Central Europe (Herrmann et al, 1984), Northern Ireland (Todd and Mc Ferran, 1985), the United States (Ben-Porat et al, 1984;Pirtle et al, 1984), and New Zealand (Tisdall et al, 1988). Although only one strain isolated in Argentina and previously classified as genotype II has been isolated from animals imported from Holland (Echeverría et al, 1994), no new isolates belonging to genotype II have been reported since 1981. Previous reports mention that genotype II is common in Holland (Gielkens et al, 1985).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, this hypothesis remains to be tested using molecular biology techniques to compare both isolates (Echeverria et al, 1994;Nosetto et al, 1997). In the case of farms 2 and 3, an outside source of transmission, such as newly introduced breeding stock seems the most likely source of infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA was isolated from the Continuous Porcine Kidney cell line [14] (CPK) infected with the CL-15 SHV-1 strain [15] at a multiplicity of infection between 1 and 5, as follows. CPK cells were grown in 75 cm 2 plastic flasks, inoculated with 1 ml of supernatant from positive cell cultures and, after extensive cytopathic effect was observed, cell pellets were washed and suspended in TEN buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl; pH7.5, 12.5 mM EDTA; pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, and 1% SDS).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%