2018
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.170879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The genomic ancestry, landscape genetics and invasion history of introduced mice in New Zealand

Abstract: The house mouse (Mus musculus) provides a fascinating system for studying both the genomic basis of reproductive isolation, and the patterns of human-mediated dispersal. New Zealand has a complex history of mouse invasions, and the living descendants of these invaders have genetic ancestry from all three subspecies, although most are primarily descended from M. m. domesticus. We used the GigaMUGA genotyping array (approximately 135 000 loci) to describe the genomic ancestry of 161 mice, sampled from 34 locatio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The population genetics of house mice (Mus musculus) has been rigorously assessed across the New Zealand archipelago using a variety of genetic markers (Searle et al, 2009;King et al, 2016;Veale et al, 2018). The population genetics of R. exulans has also been assessed, as a proxy for Polynesian migration (Matisoo-Smith et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The population genetics of house mice (Mus musculus) has been rigorously assessed across the New Zealand archipelago using a variety of genetic markers (Searle et al, 2009;King et al, 2016;Veale et al, 2018). The population genetics of R. exulans has also been assessed, as a proxy for Polynesian migration (Matisoo-Smith et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have a long track record of developing genotyping arrays for the laboratory mouse, from the Mouse Diversity Array (MDA, Yang et al 2009 ) to the previous versions of the Mouse Universal Genotyping Array (MUGA) ( Morgan and Welsh 2015 ). These tools were originally designed for the genetic characterization of two popular genetic reference populations, the Collaborative Cross (CC) and the Diversity Outbred, and then used in experiments involving other laboratory strains as well as wild mice ( Yang et al 2011 ; Collaborative Cross Consortium 2012 ; Carbonetto et al 2014 ; Arends et al 2016 ; Didion et al 2016 ; Rosshart et al 2017 ; Shorter et al 2017 ; Srivastava et al 2017 ; Veale et al 2018 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small effective population size of mtDNA makes it more susceptible to the fixation of foreign haplotypes than nuclear DNA; consequently, introgression can be seen in mtDNA without any admixture in nuclear DNA [ 74 ]. In a recent genomic study of mice in New Zealand, for example, mitochondrial capture between subspecies was observed to have independently occurred in multiple populations with no detectable nuclear introgression [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the complexity and high variability associated with genetic markers when examining population-level differences, mtDNA and nuclear DNA do not always show the same population structure, hence using both markers provides broader insight than using only one [ 2 ]. Hybridisation with red-billed gulls has previously been observed [ 13 ], and using multiple markers can reveal aspects, such as historical mitochondrial introgression, that may otherwise not be noticed [ 21 ]. Introgression is the exchange of genetic material between two species through hybridisation [ 22 ], and is particularly common in Larus gulls [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%