2006
DOI: 10.1128/jb.188.2.642-658.2006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Genome Sequence of Methanosphaera stadtmanae Reveals Why This Human Intestinal Archaeon Is Restricted to Methanol and H 2 for Methane Formation and ATP Synthesis

Abstract: Methanosphaera stadtmanae has the most restricted energy metabolism of all methanogenic archaea. This human intestinal inhabitant can generate methane only by reduction of methanol with H 2 and is dependent on acetate as a carbon source. We report here the genome sequence of M. stadtmanae, which was found to be composed of 1,767,403 bp with an average G؉C content of 28% and to harbor only 1,534 protein-encoding sequences (CDS). The genome lacks 37 CDS present in the genomes of all other methanogens. Among thes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
219
0
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 260 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
6
219
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The dominance of Methanobrevibacter in the rumen of domestic ruminants is in accord with other recent studies in Western Australia and Canada (Wright et al 2004 but contrasts with the only other report from Queensland (Wright et al 2006), where Methanobrevibacter sequences accounted for 9% of total clones sequenced from the ruminal contents of adult sheep. From the samples examined in the present study, the only anomalies to the finding of Wright et al (2006) were the sequences from the leucaena-fed fermentor where both sequences were most closely related to the human intestinal methanogen, Methanosphaera stadtmanae (Fricke et al 2006). Sequences related to this species have also been identified previously from cattle, particularly in Canada (Whitford et al 2001;Wright et al 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dominance of Methanobrevibacter in the rumen of domestic ruminants is in accord with other recent studies in Western Australia and Canada (Wright et al 2004 but contrasts with the only other report from Queensland (Wright et al 2006), where Methanobrevibacter sequences accounted for 9% of total clones sequenced from the ruminal contents of adult sheep. From the samples examined in the present study, the only anomalies to the finding of Wright et al (2006) were the sequences from the leucaena-fed fermentor where both sequences were most closely related to the human intestinal methanogen, Methanosphaera stadtmanae (Fricke et al 2006). Sequences related to this species have also been identified previously from cattle, particularly in Canada (Whitford et al 2001;Wright et al 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Sequences related to this species have also been identified previously from cattle, particularly in Canada (Whitford et al 2001;Wright et al 2007). Interestingly, M. stadtmanae is incapable of growth (and methane production) solely from carbon dioxide and hydrogen, using the methanol released during the fermentation of pectins as its primary carbon source for growth (Fricke et al 2006). Whether these 'unusual' methanogens identified from the fermentors share similar characteristics remains to be determined.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Because M. stadtmanae is unable to use hydrogen and carbon dioxide for methane synthesis and have a limited substrate range (Fricke et al, 2006), M. stadtmanaerelated methanogens are typically only found at a low prevalence in the gut of herbivores. It has been hypothesized that perhaps the degradation of large amounts of fruit pectin in frugivore hosts such as the orangutan may result in increased levels of methanol and acetate, which would favor the growth of M. stadtmanae methanogens (Facey et al, 2012).…”
Section: Non-human Primatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three thermophilic archaea (Sulfolobus tokodaii (Kawarabayasi et al, 2001), Archaeoglobus fulgidus (Klenk et al, 1997), Methanopyrus kandleri (Slesarev et al, 2002)), three thermophilic eubacteria (Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis (Bao et al, 2002), Thermotoga maritima (Nelson et al, 1999), Thermus thermophilus HB8 (GenBank: AP008226.1)), three mesophilic archaea (Methanosphaera stadtmanae (Fricke et al, 2006), Methanocorpusculum labreanum (Anderson et al, 2009), Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 (Ng et al, 2000)), and three mesophilic eubacteria (Haemophilus influenzae Rd KW20 (Fleischmann et al, 1995), Escherichia coli K12 MG1655 (Blattner et al, 1997), Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01 (Stover et al, 2000)) were surveyed in this study.…”
Section: Sequence Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%