2016
DOI: 10.1101/065789
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The genome of the crustaceanParhyale hawaiensis: a model for animal development, regeneration, immunity and lignocellulose digestion

Abstract: The amphipod crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis is a blossoming model system for studies of developmental mechanisms and more recently regeneration. We have sequenced the genome allowing annotation of all key signaling pathways, transcription factors, and non-coding RNAs that will enhance ongoing functional studies. Parhyale is a member of the Malacostraca clade, which includes crustacean food crop species. We analysed the immunity related genes of Parhyale as an important comparative system for these species, whe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
67
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 179 publications
6
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Orthology was inferred using multiple sequence alignment of peptide sequences with MUSCLE v. 3.8.31 (Edgar, 2004). Additional sequence data included were selected to represent major lineages of Mandibulata, namely, from the amphipod crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis (Kao et al, 2016). Phylogenetic inference under maximum likelihood was conducted with RAxML v. 8.0 (Stamatakis, 2014) under an LG model (Le, Dang, & Gascuel, 2012) and correction for a discrete gamma distribution, with 500 independent starts and 500 bootstrap replicates (Stamatakis, Hoover, & Rougemont, 2008).…”
Section: Bioinformatics and Probe Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orthology was inferred using multiple sequence alignment of peptide sequences with MUSCLE v. 3.8.31 (Edgar, 2004). Additional sequence data included were selected to represent major lineages of Mandibulata, namely, from the amphipod crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis (Kao et al, 2016). Phylogenetic inference under maximum likelihood was conducted with RAxML v. 8.0 (Stamatakis, 2014) under an LG model (Le, Dang, & Gascuel, 2012) and correction for a discrete gamma distribution, with 500 independent starts and 500 bootstrap replicates (Stamatakis, Hoover, & Rougemont, 2008).…”
Section: Bioinformatics and Probe Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We demonstrated here that in the multi-view mode it is particularly suited for imaging embryos of the crustacean amphipod Parhyale hawaiensis for several days. Parhyale has been already established as an attractive new model organism for developmental genetic and functional genomic studies supported by many experimental techniques, including transgenesis, CRISPR/Casmediated knock-out and knock-in approaches, genomic resources and other experimental tools (Kao et al, 2016;Martin et al, 2016;Pavlopoulos and Averof, 2005;Pavlopoulos et al, 2009;Stamataki and Pavlopoulos, 2016). By extending here the Parhyale toolkit with multi-view LSFM and the MaMuT reconstructions, it is now feasible to study gene expression and function in the context of single-cell resolution fate maps and cell pedigrees.…”
Section: Multi-view Lsfm Is Ideal To Reveal the Cellular Basis Of Parmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, these cells displayed some of the highest proliferation rates quantified during limb outgrowth, suggesting a Dpp-dependent control of Parhyale limb growth. Thanks to the stereotyped and highly ordered Parhyale body plan, we anticipate that the LSFM imaging and tracking approaches described here, together with the recent application of CRSIPR/Cas-based methodologies for genome editing (Kao et al, 2016) will provide excellent material to further explore how morphogens like Dpp regulate form and function at cellular resolution.…”
Section: Reconciling Genetic With Cellular Models Of Limb Morphogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…78.8% of genes in the Arthropod DB were complete, 17.4% were 245 present but fragmented and only 3.8% were missing. For comparative purposes, two large 246 arthropod genomes recently published (Parhyale, a crustacean, and Locust) have values of 78.5% 247 and 41.4% for completeness, 10.4% and 31.5% for fragmented, and 11.1% and 27.1% for 248 missing (Wang et al 2014;Kao et al 2016). Essentially, these 3 large genomes are 10 times the 249 size of most holometabolous insect genomes (which are about 300MB) and have very high levels 250 of repetitive DNA(Kidwell 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%