1924
DOI: 10.2307/20028366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Geneva Protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the value is a reliable evaluation of the general population. Thus, substituting from calculated values from the expression (2) into (1) equation, it is possible to receive family of curves at p probability of residual stresses, where u p is the quantile, taken from the corresponding table [13]. The curves of mean values by expression (2) of tested slack and hard composites deformations and the corresponding curves of residual stresses taken by expression (1) with help of program are given in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the value is a reliable evaluation of the general population. Thus, substituting from calculated values from the expression (2) into (1) equation, it is possible to receive family of curves at p probability of residual stresses, where u p is the quantile, taken from the corresponding table [13]. The curves of mean values by expression (2) of tested slack and hard composites deformations and the corresponding curves of residual stresses taken by expression (1) with help of program are given in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the size of the structural element (and, hence, the characteristic scale) is in the range 0.6 μm L i 50 μm. Using the normal size distribution in this range, it is possible to estimate the average size of the structural element L i = (L max − L min )/β, where β is a coefficient whose values are given in [19] (in this case, β = 5). As a result, the average characteristic size of the structural element is L i ≈ 10 μm.…”
Section: Computational-experimental Validation Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the weak signal approximation one can get from (7): L1q = The signal measurement error at the single realization is equal to the quadratic mean deviation an j(i + a) value [6]: outsn Un j(i + a) , so the signal-to-noise ratio measurement error is equal to Lq 1.…”
Section: Btn2mentioning
confidence: 99%