Abstract:Recent advances in molecular genetics have led to a better understanding of the biological underpinnings of skin cancer formation. As with most cancers, the RB, p53, and RAS pathways appear to play prominent roles in the pathogenesis of several skin cancer types. Although various components of these pathways may be differentially altered in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), basal cell carcinoma (BCC), and cutaneous melanoma, the final biochemical expression of these defects may be the same. With the unraveling of… Show more
“…The two most widespread non-melanoma cancers of epithelial origin in the skin are basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) and SCCs: the former is locally destructive, but it rarely metastasizes, while SCC cells have high metastatic potential (Tsai and Tsao, 2004). The risk of developing SCC is directly related to UV exposure and susceptibility to sunburn.…”
Section: P53 P63 and Klf4 In Skin Cancermentioning
Genetic experiments established that p63 is crucial for the development and maintenance of pluri-stratified epithelia and KLF4 for the barrier function of the skin. KLF4 is one of the factors that reprogram differentiated cells to iPS. We investigated the relationship between p63 and KLF4 using RNA interference, overexpression, chromatin immunoprecipitation and transient transfections with reporter constructs. We find that p63 directly represses KLF4 in normal keratinocytes (KCs) by binding to upstream promoter sites. Unlike p63, KLF4 levels are high in the upper layers of human skin and increase upon differentiation of KCs in vitro. In HaCaT KCs, which harbor two mutant alleles of p53, inactivation of p63 and of mutant p53 leads to KLF4 repression. p63 and p53 mutants are bound to sites in the KLF4 core promoter. Importantly, expression of the H179Y and R282Q p53 mutants in primary KCs is sufficient to activate endogenous KLF4. Finally, immunohistochemical analysis of tissue arrays confirms increased coexpression of KLF4 and mutant p53 in squamous cell carcinomas. Our data indicate that suppression of KLF4 is part of the growth-promoting strategy of p63 in the lower layers of normal epidermis, and that tumor-predisposing p53 mutations hijack p63 to a different location on the promoter, turning it into an activator of this reprogramming factor.
“…The two most widespread non-melanoma cancers of epithelial origin in the skin are basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) and SCCs: the former is locally destructive, but it rarely metastasizes, while SCC cells have high metastatic potential (Tsai and Tsao, 2004). The risk of developing SCC is directly related to UV exposure and susceptibility to sunburn.…”
Section: P53 P63 and Klf4 In Skin Cancermentioning
Genetic experiments established that p63 is crucial for the development and maintenance of pluri-stratified epithelia and KLF4 for the barrier function of the skin. KLF4 is one of the factors that reprogram differentiated cells to iPS. We investigated the relationship between p63 and KLF4 using RNA interference, overexpression, chromatin immunoprecipitation and transient transfections with reporter constructs. We find that p63 directly represses KLF4 in normal keratinocytes (KCs) by binding to upstream promoter sites. Unlike p63, KLF4 levels are high in the upper layers of human skin and increase upon differentiation of KCs in vitro. In HaCaT KCs, which harbor two mutant alleles of p53, inactivation of p63 and of mutant p53 leads to KLF4 repression. p63 and p53 mutants are bound to sites in the KLF4 core promoter. Importantly, expression of the H179Y and R282Q p53 mutants in primary KCs is sufficient to activate endogenous KLF4. Finally, immunohistochemical analysis of tissue arrays confirms increased coexpression of KLF4 and mutant p53 in squamous cell carcinomas. Our data indicate that suppression of KLF4 is part of the growth-promoting strategy of p63 in the lower layers of normal epidermis, and that tumor-predisposing p53 mutations hijack p63 to a different location on the promoter, turning it into an activator of this reprogramming factor.
“…Así, en el modelo de la carcinogénesis química de piel de ratón, la fuerza conductora de la carcinogénesis son las mutaciones en el oncogén H-Ras 38 , y el tipo de tumor predominante es el papiloma, una lesión exofítica que no se produce en la piel humana, salvo en presencia de algunos tipos de virus del papiloma. Por otro lado, en el cáncer cutáneo no melanoma humano, la frecuencia de mutaciones en oncogenes Ras es relativamente baja 39 . Otro ejemplo que marca la diferencia entre ratones y humanos es que, en el ratón, la reparación del daño producido en el DNA por la radiación solar, mediante el mecanismo conocido como escisión global de nucleótidos (G-NER), es menos relevante que en la piel humana, de ahí que para reproducir experimentalmente el síndrome del Xeroderma Pigmentoso en el ratón se requieran dosis de radiación UV extremadamente altas.…”
Section: Modelos Genéticos Con Ratones Mutantes Para La Investigaciónunclassified
FinanciaciónEl consorcio SkinModel-CM está financiado por la Comunidad de Madrid (programa S2010/BMD-2359).
Conflicto de intereses
Los autores declaran no tener ningún conflicto de intereses
AgradecimientosQueremos agradecer calurosamente el trabajo realizado por los miembros y colaboradores de nuestros laboratorios que con su trabajo de cada día han hecho posible que el programa SkinModel sea una realidad.
“…The ultraviolet (UV) component of sunlight is the major carcinogen involved in the etiology of skin cancer [1,2]. UV irradiation produces DNA photoproducts that are blocks to DNA replication by normal replicative DNA polymerases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TP53 is mutated in the majority of human cancers [13,14], including skin cancers of the BCC and SCC type [1]. Mutations in TP53 are found with high frequency (>50%) in sporadic BCC, and at a slightly lower frequency (up to 45%) in sporadic SCC and these usually bear the UV signature CC to TT and C to T transitions indicative of ultraviolet radiation B (UV-B) exposure [1,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutations in TP53 are found with high frequency (>50%) in sporadic BCC, and at a slightly lower frequency (up to 45%) in sporadic SCC and these usually bear the UV signature CC to TT and C to T transitions indicative of ultraviolet radiation B (UV-B) exposure [1,15]. The role of p53 in melanoma remains somewhat controversial, with some groups reporting mutation rates between 13-25% and others documenting much lower rates [1]. Since XP-V cells lack Pol η, they must employ other mechanisms aside from Pol η-dependent translesional synthesis to negotiate blocks to DNA replication, such as those posed by UV lesions in DNA.…”
Xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XP-V) cells lack the damage-specific DNA polymerase η and have normal excision repair but show defective DNA replication after UV irradiation. Previous studies using cells transformed with SV40 or HPV16 (E6/E7) suggested that the S-phase response to UV damage is altered in XP-V cells with non-functional p53. To investigate the role of p53 directly we targeted p53 in normal and XP-V fibroblasts using short hairpin RNA. The shRNA reduced expression of p53, and the downstream cell cycle effector p21, in control and UV irradiated cells. Cells accumulated in late S phase after UV, but after down-regulation of p53 they accumulated earlier in S. Cells in which p53 was inhibited showed ongoing genomic instability at the replication fork. Cells exhibited high levels of UV induced S-phase γH2Ax phosphorylation representative of exposed single strand regions of DNA and foci of Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 representative of double strand breaks. Cells also showed increased variability of genomic copy numbers after long-term inhibition of p53. Inhibition of p53 expression dominated the DNA damage response. Comparison with earlier results indicates that in virally transformed cells cellular targets other than p53 play important roles in the UV DNA damage response.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.