1985
DOI: 10.1017/s0021859600056380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The genetic improvement of Syrian Awassi sheep with special reference to milk production

Abstract: The improvement of milk production by the establishment of four specialized lines and subsequent within-line selection over a 7-year period under grazing conditions at Kraim station in mid-Syria is described. The specialized line showed a substantially higher total milk production amounting to a mean 25% superiority over the control line in 1979-81.The heritability of total milk yield as estimated from paternal half sib analyses was 0-53 + 0-169 for 2-year-old ewes and the genetic correlation of a single maxim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Means, standard deviations and extreme values of LW in each half score of BCS (Table 1) show that, even in nonlactating and non-pregnant animals, ewes with a similar LW can exhibit very different BCS or, in other words, ewes scoring the same BCS may have very different LW. This can probably be justified by different body sizes of ewes in this breed and/or variation in gastrointestinal contents, which are some of the most important factors that make LW difficult to interpret in ruminants (Russel et al, 1971;Hossamo et al, 1986;Jarrige, 1988).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Means, standard deviations and extreme values of LW in each half score of BCS (Table 1) show that, even in nonlactating and non-pregnant animals, ewes with a similar LW can exhibit very different BCS or, in other words, ewes scoring the same BCS may have very different LW. This can probably be justified by different body sizes of ewes in this breed and/or variation in gastrointestinal contents, which are some of the most important factors that make LW difficult to interpret in ruminants (Russel et al, 1971;Hossamo et al, 1986;Jarrige, 1988).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In accordance with the findings of Sejian et al (2009), who found that lambs born to Malpura ewes with a BCS of 2.5 at fattening were lighter at weaning than those born to ewes with a BCS of 3.0 and 3.5. the results shown in Tables 2 and 3 explain the effect of BCS on BW of ewes and lambs; higher BW was in BCS-3 and 3.5. The pre-breeding BCS had no impact on the weight at weaning or the growth of the lambs in Awassi ewes, whereas the pre-lambing BCS had a favorable impact on both results (Hossamo et al, 1986). Different letters vertically mean, significant difference at (P≤0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%