1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1996.tb01692.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The genetic effects of competition in seaweed flies

Abstract: Recciwd 2 Lkcembt-r 1994, acccptedfor fibluation 24 F e h t y 1995In spite of abundant evidence that intra-and inter-specific competition occurs in natural communities, there is surprisingly little to suggest it is a major force promoting genetic change. This report assesses the genetic effects of competition in two species of seaweed fly, Coclopajigidu and C. pi&a. In laboratory cultures of C.fngrda the relative survival of heterozygotes at the A& locus, which was being used as a marker for the large ap chrom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 ). The nonlinear influence of larval density on female fecundity is a novel finding and indicates potential facilitation between larvae during development, as has been reported in other insect species (e.g., Leggett et al 1996 ; Fletcher 2009 ; Ronnas et al 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…3 ). The nonlinear influence of larval density on female fecundity is a novel finding and indicates potential facilitation between larvae during development, as has been reported in other insect species (e.g., Leggett et al 1996 ; Fletcher 2009 ; Ronnas et al 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The reason for this assertion is that the effects of female choice on offspring fitness are principally a consequence of heterosis. Controlled laboratory experiments on egg-to-adult viability have consistently revealed strong heterosis (Butlin et al 1984;Leggett et al 1996), and heterosis is a feature of virtually all natural populations of seaweed flies (Butlin et al 1982 a;Day et al 1983;Butlin & Day 1989). The magnitude of the heterosis partly determines the strength of indirect sexual selection in each population, but it does not alter the direction of the selection; aa females consistently produce unfit offspring if they mate assortatively, whereas (3(3 females produce fitter offspring by mating disassortatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No environmental variables were measured at the time of sampling; however, because the mean size of etc/. males is strongly correlated with larval density under laboratory conditions (Leggett et al 1996), it was used as a measure of competition and general stress experienced by larvae. A strong association exists between CVA and the mean size of act males (regression coefficient, /?…”
Section: (б) Genetic Variation In Adult Size In Natural Popu Lation Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relation between CVA's (for male size) and the mean size of oca males in samples from different geographical regions. The mean size of aa males is negatively associated with larval density (Leggett et al 1996). CVAs refer to the genetic variation attributable to the a/?…”
Section: (б) Genetic Variation In Adult Size In Natural Popu Lation Smentioning
confidence: 99%