2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The genetic consequences of hatchery-induced sperm competition in a salmonid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
3
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Supportive breeding is also an important measure to reduce the short-term probability of population extinction, but artificial breeding programs should be designed so as not to further reduce the effective population size (Ryman et al, 1995b;Campton, 2004). Wedekind et al (2007) suggests that hatchery-induced sperm competition not only increases the loss of genetic variation but may also induce artificial selection, depending on the fertilization protocols. Thus, the minimization of genetic risks linked to the in vitro fertilization is crucial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supportive breeding is also an important measure to reduce the short-term probability of population extinction, but artificial breeding programs should be designed so as not to further reduce the effective population size (Ryman et al, 1995b;Campton, 2004). Wedekind et al (2007) suggests that hatchery-induced sperm competition not only increases the loss of genetic variation but may also induce artificial selection, depending on the fertilization protocols. Thus, the minimization of genetic risks linked to the in vitro fertilization is crucial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, as large females usually produce larger offspring of higher viability (Trippel 1995;Walsh et al 2006), a decrease in growth could impair the recruitment and consequently the long-term yield of the population. Third, as females in many species prefer to mate with large males (Wedekind et al 2007;Hutchings and Rowe 2008;Rudolfsen et al 2008;Jacob et al 2009;Labonne et al 2009) increased mortality of large fish could have an impact on sexual selection and therefore on mating behaviour. Fourth, non-random mortality could decrease the genetic diversity of the population and make it more vulnerable to environmental changes or diseases (Jones et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sharp contrast, current fish-farming practices generally depend on a small number of spawners and fertilise entire clutches with mixed-milt from two or three males only (Unfer, unpublished). Such an approach is likely to reduce genetic variability of hatchery strains and is probably even aggravated through sperm competition (Wedekind et al, 2007). Follow-up genetic projects, extending grayling sampling to larger parts of the Drava system and its primary tributaries should be promoted in order to unravel microgeographic population structure and define numbers and spatial distribution of intra-basin management units for conservation.…”
Section: > Fisheries Management Conservation Implications and Futurementioning
confidence: 99%