1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01383-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The `genetic benefits' of female multiple mating reconsidered

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
444
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 413 publications
(453 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
7
444
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On theoretical grounds, this benefit is unlikely as diversity does not seem to increase with multiple mating (Williams, 1975; but see Yasui, 1998). A more likely possibility is that females may be storing sperm of high-quality males to obtain viability genes for their offspring instead of genetic diversity.…”
Section: What Drives the Co-evolution?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On theoretical grounds, this benefit is unlikely as diversity does not seem to increase with multiple mating (Williams, 1975; but see Yasui, 1998). A more likely possibility is that females may be storing sperm of high-quality males to obtain viability genes for their offspring instead of genetic diversity.…”
Section: What Drives the Co-evolution?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea initially put forward is that by mating more than once, females will reduce the risk of only mating to males who carry incompatible genes. However, this bet-hedging strategy only works under very restricted circumstances [35]. Potentially of wider importance is that, whenever females mate multiply, sperm from different males will compete for fertilization of the female's ova [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commonly estimated mating-system parameter, correlated paternity, r p , describes the diversity of pollen contributions for sampled progeny arrays and is proportional to the effective number of pollen donors (Sork and Smouse, 2006). Correlated paternity is expected to be negatively correlated with fitness, as reduced pollen diversity is expected to result in a higher probability of unfit combinations of pollen and ovules via either less pollen competition or weaker heterosis (Yasui, 1998;Skogsmyr and Lankinen, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%