2012
DOI: 10.1375/twin.15.1.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Genetic Basis of Political Sophistication

Abstract: Political sophistication is a concept that encompasses political reasoning, the coherence of people's issue attitudes, and their knowledge of political processes. To what extent is political sophistication affected by genes and environments? Do these distinct but related measures of sophistication share a common genetic structure? We analyze survey data collected from participants in the Minnesota Twin Registry to estimate influences of genes and environments on variables used to measure political sophisticati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We rely on the data from Tests 1–2. In accordance with past research, we use education as our measure of political sophistication (Aarøe and Jensen 2015; Arceneaux, Johnson and Maes 2012; Hetherington 2001; Sniderman, Brody and Tetlock 1991). As summarized by Sniderman, Brody and Tetlock (1991, 21), education is ‘well measured’, ‘covaries with political awareness and information’ and constitutes the ‘the handiest proxy’ for measuring political sophistication.…”
Section: Test 3 Recollection and Persuasion In The Two-step Flow Acrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We rely on the data from Tests 1–2. In accordance with past research, we use education as our measure of political sophistication (Aarøe and Jensen 2015; Arceneaux, Johnson and Maes 2012; Hetherington 2001; Sniderman, Brody and Tetlock 1991). As summarized by Sniderman, Brody and Tetlock (1991, 21), education is ‘well measured’, ‘covaries with political awareness and information’ and constitutes the ‘the handiest proxy’ for measuring political sophistication.…”
Section: Test 3 Recollection and Persuasion In The Two-step Flow Acrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But such studies did not explore potential differences between men and women (Arceneaux, Johnson and Maes 2012;Littvay, Weith and Dawes 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medland and Hatemi () provide a detailed description of the Cholesky model geared toward a political science audience. The Cholesky decomposition has also been utilized in several recently published political science studies (Arceneaux, Johnson, and Maes ; Fazekas and Littvay ; Hatemi, Hibbing, et al. ; Klemmensen et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%