The genetic basis of modularity in the development and evolution of the vertebrate dentition

Abstract

The construction of organisms from units that develop under semi-autonomous genetic control (modules) has been proposed to be an important component of their ability to undergo adaptive phenotypic evolution. The organization of the vertebrate dentition as a system of repeated parts provides an opportunity to study the extent to which phenotypic modules, identi¢ed by their evolutionary independence from other such units, are related to modularity in the genetic control of development. The evolutionary history of vertebrates provides numerous examples of both correlated and independent evolution of groups of teeth. The dentition itself appears to be a module of the dermal exoskeleton, from which it has long been under independent genetic control. Region-speci¢c tooth loss has been a common trend in vertebrate evolution. Novel deployment of teeth and reacquisition of lost teeth have also occurred, although less frequently. Tooth shape di¡erences within the dentition may be discontinuous (referred to as heterodonty) or graded. The occurrence of homeotic changes in tooth shape provides evidence for the decoupling of tooth shape and location in the course of evolution. Potential mechanisms for regionspeci¢c evolutionary tooth loss are suggested by a number of mouse gene knockouts and human genetic dental anomalies, as well as a comparison between fully-developed and rudimentary teeth in the dentition of rodents. These mechanisms include loss of a tooth-type-speci¢c initiation signal, alterations of the relative strength of inductive and inhibitory signals acting at the time of tooth initiation and the overall reduction in levels of proteins required for the development of all teeth. Ectopic expression of tooth initiation signals provides a potential mechanism for the novel deployment or reacquisition of teeth; a single instance is known of a gene whose ectopic expression in transgenic mice can lead to ectopic teeth. Di¡er-ences in shape between incisor and molar teeth in the mouse have been proposed to be controlled by the region-speci¢c expression of signalling molecules in the oral epithelium. These molecules induce the expression of transcription factors in the underlying jaw mesenchyme that may act as selectors of tooth type. It is speculated that shifts in the expression domains of the epithelial signalling molecules might be responsible for homeotic changes in tooth shape. The observation that these molecules are regionally restricted in the chicken, whose ancestors were not heterodont, suggests that mammalian heterodonty may have evolved through the use of patterning mechanisms already acting on skeletal elements of the jaws. In general, genetic and morphological approaches identify similar types of modules in the dentition, but the data are not yet su¤cient to identify exact correspondences. It is speculated that modularity may be achieved by gene expression di¡erences between teeth or by di¡erences in the time of their development, causing mutations to have cumulative e¡ects on later-developing teeth. The mam...

A gene network model accounting for development and evolution of mammalian teeth

“…Differential expression of transcription factors has been implicated in determining different tooth identities (31)(32)(33)(34). We suggest that such transcription factors may act by affecting some of the parameters of the morphodynamic model, for example the intrinsic rate of growth of the epithelia (R e ) or the rate of secretion of activator by the epithelia (k 1 or k 3 ).…”

Integrating the genotype and phenotype in hominid paleontology

“…The concept of morphological integration was revived by Cheverud (31) and has been further refined (33)(34)(35). Building from this idea, complex analyses of shape (morphometrics) are starting to be successfully incorporated into quantitative genetic analyses (36).…”

Sox2+ progenitors in sharks link taste development with the evolution of regenerative teeth from denticles

“…Anatomical and developmental similarities between teeth and denticles, both consisting of basal bone, dentine, and a hypermineralized enamel-related tissue surrounding a pulp cavity, have long been recognized (4,5). Despite these similarities, teeth in extant vertebrates are functionally, topographically, and organizationally distinct from the rest of the exoskeleton and considered a largely independent developmental module (6,7). Current hypotheses posit that oral teeth evolved either from odontodes in the external dermal skeleton (outside-in) or deeper within the pharynx (insideout) before their eventual cooption and elaboration in jaws of early gnathostomes (1,3).…”