1963
DOI: 10.1093/genetics/48.2.157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The GENETIC BASIS OF HYPER-SYNTHESIS OF SS-Galactosidase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been extensively described as a means to confer or increase resistance to environmental stresses such as antibiotics (20) or heavy metals (32). The gene amplification could also be involved in adaptation to environments with limited nutrient concentration, usually by increasing limiting substrate uptake or processing (33)(34)(35). Here, we report the amplification of central carbon metabolism actors in response to a redox imbalance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…It has been extensively described as a means to confer or increase resistance to environmental stresses such as antibiotics (20) or heavy metals (32). The gene amplification could also be involved in adaptation to environments with limited nutrient concentration, usually by increasing limiting substrate uptake or processing (33)(34)(35). Here, we report the amplification of central carbon metabolism actors in response to a redox imbalance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Although the notion of duplication producing redundant genes is central to current theories of duplicated gene evolution, the short-term benefits of gene duplications are well known. This is illustrated by the numerous observations of adaptive gene amplifications in response to antibiotics [ 31 , 32 , 33 ], anticancer drug treatments and exposure to various toxins [ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ] or heavy metals [ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ], nutrient limitations [ 32 , 33 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ], pesticide treatments [ 51 , 52 , 53 ], extreme temperatures [ 54 , 55 ] and symbiotic and parasitic interactions [ 56 , 57 ]. Combining this information with the observations that recently duplicated genes evolve under purifying selection ([ 21 ] and our present work), it seems reasonable to hypothesize that a majority of duplicated genes that achieve fixation in a population increase fitness when present in two or more copies in a genome and thus are subject to purifying selection from the moment of duplication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the observation that purifying selection appears to act on all recent duplicates and examination of the functions of recently duplicated genes do not support the notion that gene duplication results in true functional redundancy and duplications may achieve fixation despite being redundant [ 26 ]. The alternative hypothesis - that gene duplications are fixed in a population by positive selection in all organisms - is supported by a combination of evidence of adaptive duplications from many types of living organisms: prokaryotes [ 31 , 33 , 45 , 46 , 48 , 50 , 55 , 56 ], protists [ 35 , 58 , 59 ], plants [ 39 , 44 ], fungi [ 43 , 49 ], invertebrates [ 40 , 41 , 51 , 52 , 53 ], non-mammalian vertebrates [ 54 ], as well as mammalian somatic tissues [ 34 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. Combining these observations with the suggestion that gene duplication may be a general mechanism of adaptation to various conditions of environmental stress [ 32 , 33 , 46 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 52 , 53 , 55 , 60 ], we suggest that, in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, most paralogs that are fixed in a population have a direct effect on fitness from the moment of duplication, and aid in the adaptation to various environmental conditions, primarily through a protein dosage effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of de novo CNV rates are derived from indirect and imprecise methods, and even when genome-wide mutation rates are directly quantified by mutation accumulation studies and whole-genome sequencing, estimates depend on both genotype and condition [2] and vary by orders of magnitude. Reported frequencies of duplications per locus per generation range from 10 -6 to 10 -2 in Escherichia coli and Salmonella [24][25][26][27][28][29], 10 -6 to 10 -4 in Drosophila [30,31], 10 -7 to 10 -5 in human sperm [32,33], and 10 -12 to 10 -6 in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae [34][35][36][37][38]. Reported rates of large scale duplications and aneuploidy in S. cerevisiae are 10 -5 to 10 -4 per cell per division [39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%